Gaza’s Military Operations Disprove Netanyahu Claims

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s claims he is close to achieving victory against Hamas and the resistance in the Gaza Strip. But this is a falsehood according to CNN, in partnership with the Critical Threats Project (CTP) of the American Enterprise Institute and the Institute for the Study of War. They conducted a full analyses of the military situation in Gaza and say Netanyahu’s claim is baseless.

In front of Congress and amidst warm applause on 24 July, Netanyahu said “victory [over Hamas] is on the horizon,” but analyses of the military operations carried out by the resistance since the start of the “Al-Aqsa Flood” on 7 October, 2023 tell a different story and cast heavy doubts on these claims.

The analysis, based on military data from the resistance and the Israeli army, field footage, and interviews with experts and eyewitnesses, found about half of the military battalions affiliated with Hamas, in the northern and central Gaza Strip, have rebuilt their combat capabilities, despite the ongoing Israeli war of extermination Gaza with its declared aim to eleminate Hamas and the Palestinian resistance.

The research shows Hamas succeeded in using contradictory resources on the ground effectively, as several of its units have returned to key areas, where the “army” claimed to have dismantled the resistance and ended its presence after fierce battles and intensive bombardment.

Brian Carter, director of the “Middle East File” at “CTP” and the person who led the joint research, confirmed the inaccuracy of the occupation’s claims, saying: “The Israelis say that they cleansed a place, but they did not do so completely, and they did not defeat these fighters at all.”

From Under The Rubble

The Al-Qassam Brigades, The military wing of Hamas, includes 24 battalions spread throughout the Gaza Strip. The analyses in which CNN participated focused on rebuilding 16 battalions in the northern and central parts of the Strip, where the longest battles fought against the Israeli army.

As to southern Gaza, the analyses excluded the battalions there, due to “incomplete data on the status of the remaining eight battalions,” noting accurate data and scenes broadcast by the resistance confirm its continued fighting and carrying out qualitative operations against Israeli forces.

Of the 16 battalions, seven in the northern part of the devastated Strip have been able to rebuild some of their military capabilities, at least once, during the past six months.

The evidence showed the return of the resistance’s military activity in major flashpoints. In the Jabalia camp in the north, Israel acknowledged that last May, it once again faced fierce resistance from three Hamas battalions, despite the fact that the area was destroyed by Israeli bombardment that lasted for about three months in the early days of the war last fall.

In the Zeitoun neighborhood in Gaza City, Israel carried out four incursions, according to analyses.

Field sources in northern Gaza told CNN Hamas members were overseeing the destroyed markets, and reusing burned buildings as sites for the resistance. One Palestinian confirmed to the network Hamas’s presence in the area was “stronger than you can imagine.”

On January 7, four months after the war broke out, the Israeli army announced it had “dismantled the Hamas command structure in northern Gaza.” Only days later, there were reports of attacks on Israeli patrols in the eastern parts of Gaza City.

In the weeks that followed, videos showed Hamas fighters emerging from the rubble, likely through the Strip’s sprawling tunnel network.

Commenting on this, Brian Carter of CTP said Hamas rebounded less than a week after the Israeli army withdrew from the northern Gaza Strip in January. This spread throughout the Strip and continued, he added.

“This [return to the north] was the decisive operation that Hamas’s brigades took,” Carter added.

“Israel in Gaza is like a marathon runner… but it doesn’t know where it’s going”

A senior Israeli officer, told CNN on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak. He suggested Israel’s pursuit of Hamas everywhere in Gaza would take a very long time. “We will enter every place where Hamas raises its head,” the officer said. “Can this war go on forever? No. Our society is not prepared for this. The international community is not prepared for this either.”

In response, the officer likened Israeli military activity in the Gaza Strip to “a marathon runner who doesn’t know where the stadium is. He runs and doesn’t know if he’s going in the right direction.”

US Army Colonel Peter Mansoor, who helped oversee the deployment of 30,000 additional US troops to Iraq in 2007 in the strategy known as “The Surge” (which aims to “counter-insurgency”), said that “the fact that the Israelis are still in Gaza, trying to root out elements of Hamas’s brigades, shows that Netanyahu is wrong… Hamas’s ability to reconstitute its fighting forces has not diminished.”

“Qassam Brigades Draws Israeli Forces Into Fight”

In addition, a retired senior Israeli officer said that Hamas “began the recruitment process three or four months ago, and thousands have joined.” It is worth noting that the spokesman for the Qassam Brigades, Abu Obeida, revealed last month that the Brigades “managed to recruit thousands of new fighters during the war,” reassuring that their human capabilities were fine.

Meanwhile, the Qassam Brigades continue to drag Israeli forces into repeated cycles of fighting, as analyses have found.

The analyses indicated that the rebuilding process took place in two different ways, as some units of the Qassam Brigades reorganized their ranks, merging cells that had retreated in order to form effective combat battalions, while other units reactivated, recruited new fighters, and manufactured weapons.

This article is reprinted from Jo24 taken from Al Mayadeen Satellite Television

CrossFireArabia

CrossFireArabia

Dr. Marwan Asmar holds a PhD from Leeds University and is a freelance writer specializing on the Middle East. He has worked as a journalist since the early 1990s in Jordan and the Gulf countries, and been widely published, including at Albawaba, Gulf News, Al Ghad, World Press Review and others.

Related Posts

Saudi Arabia Plays Host to Superpower Politics

By Maksym Skrypchenko 

Diplomatic efforts to end the Russia-Ukraine War are once again in the spotlight, as US and Russian officials meet in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday. In a sharp contrast to the previous administration’s strictly defined red-line policy, representatives from the newly formed US President Donald Trump-aligned diplomatic team—Secretary of State Marco Rubio, National Security Advisor Mike Waltz, and Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff—are set to engage with their Russian counterparts in discussions that many fear may sideline Ukraine’s own interests.

The stakes in this conflict extend far beyond territorial disputes. For Ukraine, the war is an existential struggle against an enemy with centuries of imperial ambition. Every defensive maneuver is a stand for sovereignty and self-determination. Yet recent diplomatic moves suggest that Ukraine’s central role in negotiations may be diminished. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s absence from the Saudi meeting underscores the deep-seated concern in Kyiv that their security concerns might be marginalized in a process dominated by transactional interests.

https://twitter.com/canon75gaz81/status/1891836717696450562

Under the previous administration, Washington’s policy was driven by a clear set of red lines designed to deter any actions that could provoke a nuclear-armed adversary. That approach was predicated on a belief that excessive support for Ukraine might lead to a dangerous escalation. However, the new strategy, as signaled by Trump’s team, appears less encumbered by these constraints. Instead, the focus seems to have shifted toward a pragmatic resolution—a process that prioritizes ending the war at the expense of Ukraine’s moral imperatives underpinning their fight for survival. This shift represents not only a departure in tone but also in substance. While the previous policy imposed strict limitations to avoid provoking Moscow, the current approach appears more willing to concede Ukraine’s positions if it serves the broader goal of ending the fighting.

Trump’s affiliation with Saudis


The decision to hold talks in Saudi Arabia is far from arbitrary. The Saudi Kingdom provides a neutral venue and a longstanding trusted mediator especially for figures like Steve Witkoff and Donald Trump, whose longstanding business and diplomatic ties in the region are well known. This credibility is further reinforced by Saudi Arabia’s recent announcement of a $600 billion package with the US, comprising investments and procurement agreements from both public and private sectors.

Moreover, Saudi Arabia’s position outside NATO shields it from the obligations that compel Western allies to enforce international legal mandates, including the ICC arrest warrants issued against top Russian officials, notably Putin. In such an environment, Saudi Arabia offers a secure venue for direct negotiations with Moscow, free from the pressures of external legal mandates.

Meanwhile, high-ranking European officials express growing concern over their exclusion from the process. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has even suggested the possibility of deploying British troops to enforce any resulting peace deal, a move that underscores the importance European leaders give to Ukraine’s future. The concerns are not merely about the cessation of hostilities, but about the long-term security guarantees that Ukraine desperately needs. European officials argue that a peace process that excludes Kyiv from the initial stages could lead to an agreement lacking the robust assurances necessary to prevent future Russian aggression.

Russian approach

Russia, for its part, is approaching the negotiations with its signature long-game strategy. Recent reports suggest that Kremlin officials are assembling a team of seasoned negotiators well-versed in securing maximum advantage. Their method is well known—ask for a shopping mall when all they need is a cup of coffee. Just one day before the talks, Russian diplomats are already staging a narrative of victory, asserting that the EU and the UK are entirely non-negotiable parties to any future agreements on Ukraine. According to the Russian representative at the UN, Ukraine has irretrievably lost key territories, and any new arrangement should force Kyiv into accepting a demilitarized, neutral state determined by future elections. This approach is designed to create the illusion of strength while ultimately settling for concessions that heavily favor Russian interests.

Meanwhile, for Ukraine, the principle that “nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine” is more than just a slogan—it is a critical security principle. Ukrainian leaders are rightfully wary of any agreement negotiated without their active participation. With the current US strategy favoring swift and transactional outcomes rather than comprehensive negotiations, there is a real danger that Kyiv’s position could be compromised. The absence of Ukraine from these early discussions may result in a peace agreement that fails to address the existential risks the nation faces. Without strong security guarantees built into any deal, Ukraine remains vulnerable to renewed incursions and a potential destabilization of the entire region.

In this evolving diplomatic landscape, the contrast between the old and new approaches is stark. The previous risk-averse strategy sought to maintain clear boundaries to prevent escalation, whereas the current approach appears more willing to blur those lines in the hope of bringing an end to the bloodshed. Yet by doing so, there is an inherent risk: the very nation fighting for its survival might be reduced to a bargaining chip in a broader geopolitical deal.

It is imperative that Ukraine’s interests remain at the forefront of any negotiations. The war in Ukraine is not just a regional conflict—it is a struggle that speaks to the fundamental principles of sovereignty and self-determination. Any peace settlement that fails to incorporate Ukraine’s security concerns is likely to be unstable at best, and catastrophic at worst.

Maksym Skrypchenko is the president of the Transatlantic Dialogue Center

Continue reading
Hebrew Media: Israel Fails to Achieve Goals of Gaza Onslaught

Israeli media outlets discussed Tel Aviv’s failure to achieve the goals of the war now ongoing for more than a year on the Gaza Strip. Hebrew newspapers stressed that the army is unable to eliminate Hamas, while disagreements are increasing regarding the future of military operations and the ceasefire agreement.

Yitzhak Brik, former commander of the Southern Corps said Israel has not been able to eliminate Hamas despite the war, now in its 15th month. He asked, “If we have failed throughout this period, how can we achieve it now?”

Brik pointed out that Hamas possesses a huge arsenal of weapons, and has developed its combat methods with its fighters exiting the underground tunnels and returning to them easily, making it difficult for the Israeli army to eliminate them.

He added Hamas has regained its strength, and that the Israeli army has destroyed no more than 10% of the tunnels of the Islamist organization, according to Israeli military sources. He also acknowledged that the military operations have not achieved their goals, and that the war has drained the army more so than at the beginning.

The army is a tool of an extremist government


For her part, Yifat Gadot, from the “Families of Soldiers Cry Enough” organization said the Israeli army has become a tool in the hands of an extremist government that is working to prolong the war to achieve its political and ideological interests.

Gadot added that there is a growing conviction among the families of soldiers that the war has become a means of maintaining the government coalition, not achieving security.

As for attorney Yair Nahorai, an expert in religious Zionist movements, he confirmed that the ongoing conflict is not just a war against Hamas, but part of an extremist religious vision that seeks to occupy Gaza, noting that some parties in the Israeli government consider the “sanctity of the land” more important than human life, which complicates the Israeli position even more.

In the same context, political analyst Ben Caspit considered that the real reason behind the slowdown in implementing the second phase of military operations is the political considerations of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

He explained that the pressure exerted by right-wing ministers, such as Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir, is obstructing the making of decisive decisions regarding the war, as Netanyahu seeks to maintain the stability of his government coalition instead of focusing on recovering the prisoners.

A Joke in the Middle East


For his part, Ben Gvir attacked the government, describing it as lacking courage, and missing a historic opportunity to impose its conditions on Hamas, adding that Israel has become a “joke in the Middle East” due to what he described as weak and hesitant decisions in managing the war and negotiations.

In contrast, Gil Dickman (a relative of one of the Israeli female prisoners killed in Gaza) responded to Ben Gvir’s statements, accusing him of politicizing the issue of prisoners, and called on him to support Netanyahu in his efforts to return the kidnapped, criticizing his withdrawal from the government due to recent agreements.

In another context, political analyst Dana Weiss stated that the Israeli political crisis escalated after statements by US President Donald Trump, who pressured the government to expedite the release of prisoners, threatening decisive responses if Israel did not respond to his demands.

Weiss confirmed that the Israeli government found itself between internal pressures from the extreme right and American and international pressures pushing towards diplomatic solutions, which further complicates the internal Israeli scene in light of the ongoing military operations in Gaza.

Continue reading

You Missed

‘Western Humanity’ Died in Gaza

‘Western Humanity’ Died in Gaza

Being Jewish After The Destruction of Gaza

Being Jewish After The Destruction of Gaza

Dr Abu Safiya Set For Release

Dr Abu Safiya Set For Release

Israel Doesn’t Represent Jews

Israel Doesn’t Represent Jews

‘We Will Return’

‘We Will Return’

Invention of The Jewish People

Invention of The Jewish People