Riyadh Outraged at Netanyahu’s Creating ‘Palestine’ on Saudi Lands

The Saudi Foreign Ministry announced, Sunday, its rejection of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s statements about establishing a Palestinian state on the Kingdom’s lands. It stated that these comments are “aimed to divert attention from the crimes committed by the Israeli occupation against the Palestinians in Gaza, including the ethnic cleansing they are subjected to.”

The ministry stressed, in a statement, that “the Palestinian people have a right to their land, and are not intruders or immigrants who can be expelled whenever the brutal Israeli occupation wants.”

In response to Netanyahu, it added: “This extremist occupation mentality does not understand what the Palestinian land means to the brotherly Palestinian people and their emotional, historical and legal connection to it, and does not consider that the Palestinian people deserve life in the first place.”

https://twitter.com/sultanalnefaie/status/1888457964081537242

It continued that “this extremist occupation mentality completely destroyed Gaza and killed and injured 160,000 Palestinians, most of whom were children and women, without the slightest human feeling or moral responsibility.”

With American support, Israel committed genocide in Gaza between 7 October, 2023 and January 19, 2025, leaving more than 159,000 Palestinians dead and wounded, most of them children and women, and more than 14,000 missing.

The Saudi ministry pointed out that “the owners of these extremist ideas are the ones who prevented Israel from accepting peace, by rejecting peaceful coexistence, rejecting peace initiatives adopted by Arab countries, and practicing systematic injustice against the Palestinian people for more than 75 years.”

It stressed that “the extremist occupation mentality does not care about right, justice, law, and the values ​​​​established in the United Nations Charter, including the right of a person to live in dignity on his land.”

The Kingdom also appreciated “what sister countries announced in terms of condemnation, disapproval, and complete rejection of what Netanyahu stated regarding the displacement of the Palestinian people from their land,” according to the same statement.

It explained that “these positions, which reject the establishment of a Palestinian state on the lands of the Kingdom, confirm the centrality of the Palestinian cause to Arab and Islamic countries.”

The Saudi Foreign Ministry concluded by saying that “the right of the brotherly Palestinian people will remain steadfast, and no one will be able to take it away from them no matter how long it takes, and lasting peace will not be achieved except by returning to the logic of reason and accepting the principle of peaceful coexistence through the two-state solution.”

In response to its firm position adhering to the establishment of a Palestinian state, Netanyahu said on Friday that “Saudi Arabia has vast areas and can establish a Palestinian state on them,” in response to a question from the Hebrew Channel 14 broadcaster regarding Riyadh’s insistence on establishing a Palestinian state as a condition to normalize relations with Tel Aviv.

Netanyahu claimed that “Riyadh does not stipulate the establishment of a Palestinian state for normalization with Israel.”

On more than one occasion, Saudi Arabia has stipulated the Israeli government’s approval of the establishment of a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders in exchange for normalizing relations.

Netanyahu’s statements come days after US President Donald Trump spoke about his country’s intention to seize the Gaza Strip and displace the Palestinians from it, and that Saudi Arabia no longer stipulates the establishment of a Palestinian state for normalization with Israel, which sparked widespread regional and international rejection.

Since 25 January, Trump has been promoting a plan to displace Palestinians from Gaza to neighboring countries such as Egypt and Jordan, which was rejected by both countries, and was joined by other Arab countries and regional and international organizations as reported by Anadolu news.

Continue reading
Trump’s Plan: ‘Unrealistic’, ‘Imaginary’, ‘Political Tricks, ‘Unfeasible’

Israeli newspapers are frowning on statements made by US President Donald Trump about displacing Palestinians from the Gaza Strip to neighboring countries such as Egypt and Jordan. Articles are appearing criticizing the plan as unrealistic, stating the Palestinians will not leave their land, and the Trump statements are mere “political tricks” without any real plan of action.

Not Realistic

Political analyst Avi Issacharoff confirmed the Palestinians wholehearted rejection of the plan and the continued control of Hamas over Gaza make Trump’s statements inapplicable on the ground.

The writer in Yedioth Ahronoth wrote: “Trump’s statements about displacing Palestinians sparked the imagination of a large number of Israelis. After 7 October, many wanted to see Gaza disappear and its residents leave for it to turn into a prosperous American Riviera. But the only problem is that this is not realistic.”

He believed the ideas made by Trump may merely be a political maneuver or a negotiating step with Hamas, but he stressed it “is not a real plan of action, because there is no Arab entity willing to cooperate with it, including the moderate Arab countries that strongly oppose it.”

He explained Arab countries such as Egypt and Jordan, while receiving American aid, are more concerned about the influx of Palestinian refugees into their territories whilst Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have also expressed their opposition to the idea.

Historical Wound

As for the Palestinian side, Issacharoff stressed no Palestinian party could agree to a displacement plan, noting the idea of ​​mass departure is linked in Palestinian memory to the 1948 Nakba, which remains a historical wound.

The political analyst also warned of the repercussions of the displacement plan, as it could strengthen extremism within Israel and hinder ongoing efforts to complete any deal. He said, “There is doubt Trump’s statements will lead to the release of prisoners, but…hasten the resumption of fighting, which will condemn Israel to more months of war in Gaza.”

He added: “As long as there is no alternative to Hamas, any military operations will only lead to more destruction and killing, without achieving the desired goal of its collapse Hamas. The result will be more Israeli casualties and the continuation of the war without a clear political horizon.”

No Deportation From Gaza

He concluded by stressing “flattening Gaza and deporting its residents is an unfeasible dream, and is merely a gimmick by an American president seeking to prove his superiority over others.” He added Hamas still controls the Gaza Strip, and no one threatens its existence.

For his part, Israeli analyst Uri Misgav told Haaretz: There will be no “deportation” from Gaza, and the Americans will not build a “Riviera” there. There is no plan, no preparatory work, no point, and no one will receive two million Palestinians on their land. We are not in the days of World War II. Trump is babbling meaninglessly, this is his style. He has suggested in the past building hotels in North Korea instead of nuclear missiles. Since his election, he has talked about invading Panama, seizing Greenland, and annexing Canada. We are old enough to remember how he once said during a meeting with Netanyahu about annexing the West Bank to Israel.

Experts Continuous Media Bombardment with Empty Speech

“It is insulting to intelligence to take Trump’s random statements seriously,” Misgav told Haaretz. “He is completely mentally unstable, and we live in an era of accelerating decline. It is true that Netanyahu is also a psychopath with no conscience, but he is not stupid. Even he froze in discomfort when Trump began raving about evacuating Gaza, while Netanyahu lavished embarrassing praise on him.”

“It is sad to see large parts of the Israeli media cooperating with this farce, and engaging in discussions at the level of a seventh-grade social studies lesson, about deportation – for or against. Even before the moral dimension, this basically reflects superficiality and intellectual laziness. They are very easy to manipulate. And here Trump and Netanyahu are already experts in “continuous media bombardment with empty talk about things that will never happen – tomorrow, Trump will not even remember what he was talking about.”

On the other hand, the Times of Israel newspaper ruled out the possibility of Trump’s plan being implemented in the near future, as the residents of Gaza, who survived 15 months of violent Israeli attacks, do not want to live in exile, and Trump will not send American forces to force some two million Palestinians to leave the Strip.

Egypt and Jordan will also not agree to the plan, despite Trump’s confidence that their dependence on American aid and military support gives him enough leverage to pressure them to accept large numbers of Gazan refugees. But this plan crosses the red lines of both countries.

Great Concern in Jordan

The newspaper indicated that Trump’s plan could raise great concerns in Jordan, as it already has a majority population of Palestinian origin, so the influx of hundreds of thousands of Gazan refugees could destabilize the country, which is already facing internal political challenges.

On the other hand, Egypt sees the influx of large numbers of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip as an existential threat to its own national security.

The newspaper reported that there are many issues on which Trump and Netanyahu can cooperate, such as ending the Iranian nuclear program, strengthening Israel’s regional position, and confronting international institutions such as the International Court of Justice and some UN agencies. Therefore, wasting political efforts on Trump’s plan for Gaza may not be the best option.

In the same context, a report broadcast by Israel’s Channel 12 stated that Trump’s plan to evacuate the residents of Gaza and place it under American control faces legal, security, and economic obstacles, and could lead to a long-term war in the Middle East.

War Crime

The report quoted international law experts warning that the mass displacement of Palestinians could constitute a “war crime” under the Geneva Conventions, sparking widespread international criticism.

The channel indicated that the cost of implementing the plan could reach tens of billions of dollars, which sparked objections even within the Republican Party, as some refuse to fund a project of this size. The plan also met with widespread opposition within the United States, as Democrats considered it a violation of international law.

As for the American Wall Street Journal, it said that Trump’s proposal regarding control of Gaza “stunned his allies and Middle East experts, and left many questions unanswered.”

The newspaper added that “any American military deployment of this kind would be long-term, something Trump has repeatedly condemned,” expressing its belief that the proposal “would be met with rejection in the Arab world.”

For its part, the American Time magazine said that Trump’s proposal “was met with sharp criticism,” noting that “some Democrats described the proposal as crazy and morally inappropriate.”

The magazine indicated that Democratic Representative Rashida Tlaib condemned the plan and considered it a purge Ethnically, “while Netanyahu expressed interest in the idea and saw that it was worth studying.”

Finally, the American Foreign Policy said that what President Trump is planning for Gaza “will be a disaster for everyone, especially Jordan, which takes the president’s talk about the forced displacement of Gaza residents very seriously.”

The magazine concluded by saying that what Trump does not know “is the extent of the damage that will be inflicted on American interests if Jordan is exposed to any disturbances as a result of his plans,” as reported by the Shihab news agency.

Continue reading
Netanyahu: ‘Saudis Can Create a Palestinian State on Their Land’

In a bomb-shell remark Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, Thursday, if the Palestinians want an independent state they should establish it in Saudi Arabia.  

The remark made in Israel’s Channel 14 interview, is gaining much  traction. It is trending on the social media with commentary and images.

“The Saudis can create a Palestinian state in Saudi Arabia, they have a lot of land there,” he told the interviewer and he was being serious.

Netanyahu’s comments as can be expected, are being carried by many news agencies around the world. This latest controversial statement was made after US President Donald Trump said Tuesday, the United States is going to take over Gaza and turn it into a “Middle East Riviera”.

The Saudi Foreign Ministry was quick to fire-down the comments made by Netanyahu which were made within the context of normalization with Riyadh.

the Saudi Foreign Ministry dismissed Netanyahu’s narrative reiterating normalization with Israel is off the table unless a Palestinian state is established according to the Anadolu news agency.  It adds that this is “a stance Netanyahu continues to disregard.”

In another report in Al Mayadeen it was reported that normalization between Saudi Arabia and Israel is not an option until the two-state solution is realized and a Palestinian state is established. This is while the Saudi ambassador to Washington emphasized that Riyadh is open to future ties with Israel but insists on a ceasefire and the establishment of a Palestinian state first. 

Continue reading
Trump’s ICC Betrayal

Amnesty International on Friday criticized US President Donald Trump’s executive order imposing sanctions on the ICC after it issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and his former minister Galant, saying it “betrays” the international justice system. In a statement, Agnes Callamard, secretary general of the rights group based in the UK, said the sanctions suggest Trump endorses the Israeli government’s crimes and is embracing impunity. “This reckless action sends the message that Israel is above the law and the universal principles of international justice,” she added.

Continue reading
Trump, Gaza and The New Political Ploy


Dr Sami Al-Arian

The infamous 19th-century imperialist and racial supremacist, Cecil Rhodes, once remarked: “It is our duty to seize every opportunity to acquire more territory and we should keep this one idea steadily before our eyes that more territory simply means more of the Anglo-Saxon race.” He then added: “Just fancy those parts that are at present inhabited by the most despicable specimens of human beings, what an alteration there would be if they were brought under Anglo-Saxon influence.”

More than a century later, US President Donald Trump expressed similar attitudes during his meeting on Feb. 4, with the Israeli prime minister and indicted war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu, when he said: “We will take over the Gaza Strip, will own it long-term and will redevelop it … I do see a long-term ownership position.” In a settler-colonialist spirit, Trump callously continued, “I don’t think people should be going back to Gaza. I think that Gaza is not a place for people to be living.” He neglected to mention, of course, the exception for Jewish settlers in prime real estate along the Gaza beach. He then added, “They’re living in hell,” without any hint of irony, considering the 15-month US-sponsored genocide, supported by funds, bombs, and diplomatic protection.

Strategic agenda and regional dynamics

There were many items on the agenda between Trump and Netanyahu, including Iran’s nuclear program, the future of Gaza and the West Bank, and normalization with Saudi Arabia.

To be sure, Trump was not an unknown quantity. In his first term, he demonstrated total hostility towards the Palestinians and embraced the most radical positions espoused by extremist Zionists. These included recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and relocating the US Embassy there, the annexation of the Syrian Golan Heights (occupied by Israel since 1967), the closure of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) office in Washington, DC, ending all humanitarian aid to the Palestinians through the UN refugee agency (UNRWA) or US agencies, and integrating Israel within US Central Command (CENTCOM), the US military command responsible for a region stretching from Egypt to Afghanistan.

Furthermore, throughout his presidency Trump completely disregarded the so-called two-state solution — a long-touted US goal — in favor of Netanyahu’s approach of normalizing relations with Washington’s Arab client regimes while pursuing an aggressive settlement expansion policy intended to establish a de facto Greater Israel. In effect, it appears that “Trump 2.0” is trying, in his own way, to fulfill his promises of securing a greater Israel for his right-wing Zionist donors [1], benefactors [2] and appointees [3]. The proposal to forcefully remove over 2 million Palestinians from Gaza does not appear serious or achievable, since the Palestinians will never cooperate in their own displacement, nor would neighboring countries be willing to support a dangerous plan that would destabilize the region. In the past, Trump proposed similar hyperbolic ideas that failed to materialize, including his calls [4] for constructing a Riviera on the beaches of North Korea.

Netanyahu came to the White House with several objectives in mind. He sought Trump’s support to continue his war of extermination in Gaza after freeing many Israeli captives at the end of the first stage of the ceasefire deal. His political allies pressured him to resume the war in order to achieve his elusive objective of dislodging Hamas and eradicating the resistance — an aim he has not accomplished during the 15-month onslaught. It would appear that Trump wants to achieve this goal using political means through his outrageous proposal rather than through military pressure. If that is the case, this would be Trump’s way of handing Netanyahu the fig leaf he needs to silence his hard right critics and conclude the second stage of the ceasefire deal.

On Iran, Trump has doubled down on his policy of applying extreme pressure through economic sanctions in order to get the Iranians to negotiate a deal on their nuclear program. In return, the Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has called [5] for “maximum wisdom” to be applied to relations between Washington and Tehran, instead of the “maximum pressure” policy Trump has espoused. Since these are the early stages of diplomatic maneuverings, it’s very doubtful that Netanyahu received a green light from Trump to use military strikes against Iran in the near term.

On the West Bank, the Zionist regime has been escalating its aggressive settlement policy as well as its unprecedented attacks on several Palestinian cities, particularly against refugee camps in Jenin, Nablus, Tobas and Tulkarem.

Towards a Saudi-Israeli accord and its fallout

In the past, Trump and many of his administration officials, such as the new US ambassador to the Zionist regime, Mike Huckabee, have endorsed the expansion of Israeli settlements and the calls for annexing large parts of the West Bank. But backing such a policy now will certainly impede the central piece of Trump’s main objective in the region, which is to conclude a normalization deal with Saudi Arabia. To negotiate a deal with the Saudis, Trump must rein in Netanyahu and his extremist allies by promising them what they desire most: a Gaza free not only of Hamas’ rule but also of Palestinians, as well as the annexation of a large part of the West Bank, in exchange for a normalization deal with the Saudis and possibly beyond.

The Israelis certainly know that they will not get the Palestinians to leave voluntarily when they could not compel them to do that through their genocidal war. They recognize that they cannot unilaterally annex parts of the West Bank before the normalization deal with the Saudis is concluded. They also know that Trump has a very long agenda, both domestically and internationally, particularly with regard to the Ukraine war and China, and will not allow a devastating war with Iran to disrupt his agenda. Once the fog of the visit clears, it will become apparent that Trump’s primary policy in the Middle East is to cement a Saudi-Israeli agreement, one that cannot be finalized without putting a hold on other contentious issues such as a military escalation with Iran, West Bank annexation, or the resumption of the Gaza genocide. But that does not mean that the Zionist regime and its supporters within the Trump administration will not push hard to achieve all their objectives in Gaza, the West Bank and against Iran. Regardless, the Palestinians and their supporters worldwide must be vigilant to resist and defeat all their nefarious plans, particularly in Gaza, the West Bank, as well as any plans to integrate a genocidal regime in the region.

People across the Middle East have witnessed the true colors of the Zionist regime. Achieving a normalization deal with the Saudis or any other party would require nothing less than the total erasure of their collective memory. It would appear that the main lesson of the Oct. 7 attacks has not been learned. They took place at a time when regional and international actors had all but buried the Palestinian cause and ignored the plight of the Palestinians in pursuit of their own interests. Not only will none of the policies advanced by Trump address these issues, but they will exacerbate them. And thus, like his forgotten deal of the century, these policies are doomed to fail.

[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/25/us/politics/miriam-adelson-trump-israel.html

[2] https://www.thejc.com/news/usa/from-jared-kushner-to-miriam-adelson-meet-the-jewish-figures-in-trumps-inner-circle-sllz2ky1

[3] https://www.palestinechronicle.com/from-stefanik-to-hucabee-donald-trumps-cabinet-is-a-pro-israel-swamp/

[4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-iTikGb-CY

[5] https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2025/02/06/irans-foreign-minister-calls-for-maximum-wisdom-in-response-to-trumps-maximum-pressure-tehran-policy/

Dr Sami Al Arian is public affairs professor and the director of the Center for Islam and Global Affairs at Sabahattin Zaim University in Istanbul.

Continue reading