To Piers Morgan: How Can The Killing of Women Children Be Justified as a ‘Moral Right’

British broadcaster and journalist Piers Morgan said Israel’s killing of Palestinian civilians in Gaza, including women and children, could be justified as a “moral right.”

In an interview this week with journalist Tucker Carlson on a rooftop in Saudi Arabia’s capital, Morgan discussed several topics, including the Israeli assault in Gaza and whether the U.S. should be funding it.

Carlson condemned Israel’s bombardment of civilians for over a year, which Morgan questioned as he said such bombing ‘wasn’t evil.’

Carlson said: ‘If you’re intentionally killing civilians, you probably shouldn’t beat your chest and brag about it… maybe you can make the case that you had to do it, but you should weep.’

‘Is it evil though?’ Morgan responded, to which Carlson argued: ‘To kill civilians on purpose? I think it is. Kids and children? Yeah.’

Morgan said he could see there being a ‘moral right’ to civilian deaths in wartime, saying: ‘If there is a world war that threatens the entire world, yes.’

When Carlson called his view ‘disgusting’, he walked back and said it could be justified ‘in a pure defensive action’ as the two journalists sparred over the assault.

‘To intentionally kill noncombatants, women and children, I think we can say that’s wrong,’ he concluded.

The two journalists moved onto the issue of whether the US should continue funding Israel’s assault in Gaza, after former President Joe Biden sent at least $17.9 billion in military aid since the start of the Israeli genocide in October 2023.

After Carlson repeated his calls for the US to stop supplying aid to Ukraine in its conflict with Russia, Morgan questioned: ‘Why do you support Israel against Hamas? Why do you support giving them billions of dollars?’

‘I don’t,’ Carlson snapped back.


‘I support Israel in the sense that I really like Israel, I brought my family on vacation there… but (I support Israel) only to the extent that it helps the United States.’

Morgan said this was a hypocritical stance given his criticism of aid to Ukraine, saying his support merely ‘depends on which country’.

‘I don’t see a difference between (Israel’s bombing of Gaza) and what is happening in Ukraine,’ Morgan continued.

‘This is a long way away from America, there is no direct involvement with America or no mainland involvement, and yet you think it’s right that America supports Israel, but you don’t think it’s right that America supports Ukraine.’

Fifteen months of Israeli bombardment have reduced buildings to rubble and ash, leaving large areas of Gaza uninhabitable. More than 47,400 Palestinians were killed during the Israeli assault, with 70 percent of the victims being women and children, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry.

Continue reading
Trump Recycled!

By Saleem Ayoub Quna


CROSSFIREARABIA – In his younger years (in the late 70s and early 80s of last century), Trump, the rising and flamboyant businessman, when asked by reporters about his presidential aspirations, repeatedly said that he did not want to become a president!


Time has just proved that he was lying even at that early stage! But it was a lie that took a nap that lasted nearly four decades! The nap finally came to an end in 2016. Trump was the first person who could not
believe, his own eyes and ears, that he won the race to become the 45th President of the US!


Prior to that surprising outcome, the vast majority of polls, indications and analyses were in favor of his rival, the veteran Democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton.


Another interesting coincidence in Trump’s path to the White House, then and now was the fact that his two rivals in the two races were women! This last race in November, however, was unexpectedly different in that he won by a large and significant margin, one which the Americans label as a “landslide victory”!


Even during the shorter nap or forced absentia from real politics, when “sleepy” Joe Biden occupied the White House for four years, Trump was not never absent from the public eye and the thirsty and nagging American media. He frequently appeared in the media sitting in courtrooms, in different locations (States), frustrated yet polite, listening to more than 30 allegations, leveled against him by Attorney Generals, of breaking the rules of the land.


The question number one in the US and around the world today is this: Will Trump repeat himself, or should we expect a recycled Trump? Either way, someone around him will, definitely, remind him that the world has significantly changed since his interrupted presidency back in 2020!

This someone would also remind Trump that he was not the only one who must have learned his lesson. Others did that too, especially his country’s big so-called “adversaries” or rivals around the world, the likes of China, Russia, North Korea, Iran and others!


His country’s allies and friends, the likes of the European Union, the Ukraine, Japan, South Korea and Israel must have also done their homework, and were readying themselves for this expected day as Trump has re-merged from his forced absentia.


Whatever the case might be, Trump’s second term will be even more newsworthy and consequential! The issues at stake are huge and complicated, such as the illegal immigrants from South America, the Paris Agreement on climate change, the commercial war with China, NATO relations, the Ukraine-Russian war, the war in the Middle East and other problems.


If Trump and his new hand-picked team think they can handle all these issues in the span of four years, they must be either over optimistic or naïve. Remember when Trump back in the 2016 presidential race against Clinton, kept saying he will build a wall along the borders with Mexico to stop the flaw of immigrants and workers to the US and vowed that Mexico will pay the cost?


Has the new Trump’s team prepared an answer to that question? If I were part of that team, I would take a look at the US-Mexico borders and statistics today first. Trump may have the luxury of changing faces and hats of his team. But he cannot escape from his own instincts and mentality as a bossy powerful and cunning businessman as he faces a new dynamic world order, in which his country happens to be just the number one player!


The issues at stake today are much intimidating and bigger than Trump’s credentials, ambitions and instincts! Yes, he can tackle some pending socioeconomic problems at home, apply “anesthesia” techniques to address other international problems like the situation in the Middle East or the relations
with China or Iran or Russia, but he cannot ever put an end to any of the above, once for all in just four years!

This opinion was especially written for Crossfire Arabia by Saleem Ayoub Quna who is a Jordanian author writing on local, regional and international affairs and has two books published. He has a BA in English Literature from Jordan University, a diploma from Paris and an MA from Johns Hopkins University in Washington. He also has working knowledge of French and German.

Continue reading
Trump’s Paradigm Shifts 

Dr Khairi Janbek

Islolationism in American terms meant historically, the interests of the USA are best served by not getting entangled in wars across the Atlantic, nor in the political affairs of Europe and possibly beyond, while keeping the economic expansion going.

Now to what extent will the incoming administration of Donald Trump proceed with isolationism and to what extent it believes will serve US interests?; in the mean time let us not forget that people electioneering or euphoric, are not the same people in the Oval Office. 

But still the first signs of isolationism are emerging in the field of US trade policy, with intended high customs and duties on imported goods from abroad.

This goes as well for the foreign policy of Trump which signals his distaste to negotiating with blocks and preferring bilateral agreements. This puts him in good standing with likeminded world leaders but certainly at odds with the EU, which by extension at odds with NATO also.

Ukraine

As for the current hot spots, Trump is accustomed to paradigm shifts, for a start he thinks that supporting Ukraine is a money losing project, and good business requires an atmosphere for peace. Therefore, most likely Trump will adopt a position of neutrality in this war, neither doing anything to harm Ukraine effectively, nor help it financially or militarily, while at the same time, trying to open diplomatic and trade dialogue with Russia. 

He may take the initiative to urge negotiations between the two parties on the basis of a business deal, in other words concessions.  No Meg’s Russia and not totally sovereign Ukraine, in any case, in Trump’s eyes, it is a European war after all.

Mideast

Now when it comes to the Middle East, this can be more tricky.  Trump has good relations with the Gulf Arab leaders, leaders of Egypt and Jordan, but also he is committed to the security of Israel and has good relations with Netanyahu. 

In a sense he has to square the circle if he wants to keep his relationships unscathed to deal with two most sour issues: The two state solution to the Palestinian problem, and the future of Iran, while taking into consideration, that both his allies, Egypt and Jordan are jittery about the issue of population transfer.

Trump’s option would be offering Netanyahu a free hand in Iran with US support, in exchange for a semblance of Palestinian self-rule, thus paving the way for deligitimising Hamas while legitimizing and presenting the continuation of war as a war between Israel and Iran, with Iran’s proxies being a legitimate target. 

Dr Khairi Janbek is a Jordanian writer based in Paris and the above opinion is that of the author and doesn’t reflect crossfirearabia.com. 

Continue reading
Smotrich: Last Fallen Angel of Death, Starvation!

By Saleem Ayoub Quna

“Pogrom” is a Russian word which means an organized act of cruel behavior or killing done to a large group of people based on their race and religion.

The word caught the attention of Europeans in the third quarter of the 19th century after many Jewish communities in towns and cities across the south-eastern parts of the Russian Empire, mainly Poland, Ukraine and Odessa, were attacked and harassed by the larger community, followers of the Russian Orthodox Church. They saw members of the smaller Jewish communities exploiting and blackmailing them, for financial and commercial gain.

The wave of pogroms spread to other countries in Europe in similar fashion and continued for three years in the early 1880s. These events paved the way for some Jewish activists like the Hungarian-born, Theodor Herzl, a writer, journalist and lawyer, to start a political movement to defend the Jews against such attacks. Herzl later became the founder of Zionism.

Another most important reason for the repeated pogroms was the assassination of Russia’s Tsar Alexander II at the hands of a Jew. The Tsar was blamed for encouraging his people to attack members of the Jewish community.

In addition to killing, setting on fire, and vandalizing Jewish properties in the above-mentioned cities and towns, tactics of starvation and deprivation were systematically employed to further harass and punish the Jews.

Later in the early and mid-1940s and under the watch of Adolf Hitler, the founder of Nazis, European Jews especially in Germany were brutally persecuted in a process that led to what the Jews call the “ Holocaust”; this became a decisive turning point in Jewish-European relations.

Enter Smotrich

Today, almost 140 years after the pogroms, and 80 years after the Holocaust, a descendant from the Ukraine, the land of the pogroms and holocaust atrocities, the name of Bezalel Smotrich emerges from the smoke of guns over the strip of Gaza, to openly call for the expulsion of all Palestinians from their ancestral home land that today forcefully became Israel.

It also happens that he is also the actual Finance Minister in Netanyahu’s extreme-right government, and head of the National Religious Party.

Although he was born, according to international law, in an illegal settlement on the occupied Syrian Golan Heights, his last name should be a reminder of his ancestors’ village (Smotrych) west of Ukraine today!

If the expulsion of all Palestinians from Gaza and the West Bank who refuse to recognize his “greater Israel”, according to this man doesn’t work, Israel must resort to every possible tactic to drive them out of their homes.

These tactics must include but not limited to exterminating as many Palestinians as possible in Gaza and/or starving them to death, and that will be just fine for him and even moral as he recently made clear.

It is ironic that the an offspring of survivors of the pogroms and Holocaust, gives himself the right and liberty to borrow the same ugly tactics applied against his own ancestors, to be practiced against those who had nothing to do with European pogroms and Holocaust atrocities!  Such a bizarre and mind-boggling analogy makes one wonder what kind of character we are dealing with here?

This man, I strongly believe, has more than one little problem! He has a short and selective memory; has an overdose of instinct hatred against those who oppose him; and an extreme sense of superiority versus any different ethnic or religious group.

Finally one simple advice for, hopefully, the last fallen angel of death and starvation: Ask your Sephardim compatriots who lived and thrived in many Arab countries, like Egypt, Iraq, Morocco, Tunisia, Yemen and Syria before the establishment of your “little Israel” in 1948, if any heard about or experienced any kind of pogrom behaviors at the hands of their Muslim and Christian compatriots, who lived in peace and harmony for more than two and half millennia long before your ancestors survived the atrocities of European pogroms and Holocaust and decided to take refuge in this part of the world?

This opinion was especially written for Crossfire Arabia by Saleem Ayoub Quna who is a Jordanian author writing on local, regional and international affairs and has two books published. He has a BA in English Literature from Jordan University, a diploma from Paris and an MA from Johns Hopkins University in Washington. He also has working knowledge of French and German.

Continue reading
Smotrich: It is “Justified, Moral” to Starve Gazans

CROSSFIREARABIA – If it was up to him, Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich would starve to death the over two million Palestinians living in the Gaza Strip. He said such action would be “justified and moral”.

His comments are trending on the social media.

However, he added the international community wouldn’t allow us to do it. “We can’t, in the current global reality, manage a war. Nobody will let us cause two million civilians to die of hunger even though it might be justified and moral until our hostages are returned,” Smotrich told a conference hosted by Israel’s Hayom daily newspaper according to Anadolu.

“Humanitarian in exchange for humanitarian is morally justified, but what can we do? We live today in a certain reality, we need international legitimacy for this war,” he added.

One blogger has called him a “fanatic terrorist settler” while another says ‘this racist monster doesn’t know the true meaning of justice and morality.”

Smotrich’s comments have “sparked outrage reflecting a disturbing rhetoric that is interpreted as indicative of genocidal intent,” states Al Mayadeen English.

“The Nazi-like genocidal intent of apartheid Israel is unmistakable in Smotrich’s criminal words,” says Professor Jonathan Moyo, former minister of higher education in Zimbabwe.

“We are bringing in aid because there is no choice,” Smotrich said, calling for Israel to have full control over what enters the Palestinian enclave.

The far-right minister reiterated his opposition to any prisoner swap deal with Hamas, claiming that current cease-fire proposals are “unjust and unethical” as they would only return a few hostages and jeopardize state security, Anadolu stated.

He also expressed his opposition to releasing Palestinian prisoners in exchange for Israeli hostages, asserting that they would “return to kill Jews.”

Moreover, Smotrich reiterated his controversial stance on the resettlement of the Gaza Strip, claiming that: “Where there is no settlement, there is terror.”

But Gaza is already being starved through an Israeli imposed crippling blockade instituted on the Strip since the 7 October, 2023 Hamas attack, leaving the territory’s entire population on the verge of famine.

Thousands of aid trucks stand idle on the Rafah border unable to get into Gaza because of the Israeli big guns. What is being allowed is only a trickle to feed a hungry population who are dying because they are being starved.

This has been the case for the last 10 months with Israel turning the transport and entry taps as it pleases.

Continue reading