Israel Soldier Begs For Food Before He Dies of Hunger

“Please bring food in before I die of hunger. I am on the verge of death and living in hell,” said the captive Israeli soldier Rom Barslavsky, appealing to his government in a message described by Saraya al-Quds, the military wing of the Islamic Jihad movement, as the last before losing contact with the group holding him captive in the Gaza Strip.

The Saraya broadcast a video of the 22-year-old Israeli captive from occupied Jerusalem, appearing in his place of captivity, weeping, tired, and exhausted, tossing and turning in his bed.

The video was titled “Gaza… Killing by Starvation,” referring to the worsening humanitarian conditions in the Strip. The captive confirmed that he has been held by Saraya al-Quds for more than a year and nine months, noting that his suffering began following what he called the “Gideon’s Wagons” operation.

Barslavsky described his deteriorating health, saying: “I’m in a bad condition. I have pain in my feet and hands. Every time I try to get up and go to the bathroom, I feel dizzy and fall. I can’t breathe and I can’t continue living.”

The prisoner revealed a significant decrease in the amount of food he is provided, confirming that “from morning until night, there is nothing,” and that he eats “only three falafel sandwiches throughout the day” or “barely a plate of rice.”

He added, crying, “I simply don’t eat or drink. There is no food here. Food is scarce, and we can barely get it.”

The prisoner spoke about watching children in Gaza on television, saying, “I saw children dying of hunger, skeletons. I’ve never seen scenes like this before.”

He appealed to his government, “This is immoral. This is torture. This is torture against innocent children. What is their fault that you should do this to them?”

The prisoner begged Israeli officials, saying: “Stop this hell we’re living in. Stop this suffering. Please stop this war. Don’t continue killing young children. Don’t continue your campaign of starving them. These actions do not suit your conscience.”

Barslawski made a final plea, saying: “If not for the children of Gaza, then do it for your prisoners in Gaza. Bring in food and drink. I beg you.”

The video showed images of the prisoner writing in his diary in Hebrew while crying, in addition to previous photos of himself and children dying of hunger in Gaza.

The Al-Quds Brigades concluded the video with a clear message: “What our people are suffering, your prisoners are suffering,” linking the suffering of the prisoners to the suffering of the Palestinian people in the besieged Gaza Strip.

Al Jazeera

  • CrossFireArabia

    CrossFireArabia

    Dr. Marwan Asmar holds a PhD from Leeds University and is a freelance writer specializing on the Middle East. He has worked as a journalist since the early 1990s in Jordan and the Gulf countries, and been widely published, including at Albawaba, Gulf News, Al Ghad, World Press Review and others.

    Related Posts

    World Cup Through Gazan Eyes

    Despite the heavy burden of war, displacement, loss, and deprivation they have endured for nearly three years, many Gazans, especially the youth, have not relinquished their passion for football and following the World Cup matches. They have become a temporary escape from the harsh reality of war.

    With the start of the Arab teams’ matches in the world’s most important football tournament, displacement camps in the Gaza Strip have been transformed into something resembling “popular caravans” or open-air cafes, where hundreds of displaced people gather in front of large screens or televisions to watch the matches and cheer on their favorite teams.

    In the Nuseirat camp in the central Gaza Strip, hundreds of Gazans gathered in the main square of the Nuseirat market in front of a giant screen to watch the match between the Egyptian national team and their Belgian counterparts, which ended in a 1-1 draw. Cheers and popular songs filled the air during the match, a scene that brought a measure of vitality back to faces worn down by war.

    In the Khan Younis area of ​​southern Gaza, some of the tents housing displaced people have been transformed into makeshift cafes. Young men sit on wooden benches in front of televisions to watch matches of the Arab teams participating in the tournament. Some tents are decorated with Egyptian flags, and several young men drape the flags over their shoulders while watching the games.

    During major sporting events, Gazans typically make a point of showing their support for the Arab teams, expressing the cultural and social ties that bind them to the Arab world and emphasizing their shared sense of solidarity and belonging.

    For many residents of the Gaza Strip, these gatherings represent a rare opportunity for recreation and a break from the pressures of daily life. They also offer a temporary space for joy and engagement with a global event, away from the constant bombardment, displacement, and suffering.

    However, watching the World Cup in Gaza is not as easy as it is in other parts of the world. In addition to the dire humanitarian situation and economic collapse, residents face financial, technological, and security challenges that make watching the matches a difficult task.

    High Subscription Costs

    The high subscription cost of beIN SPORTS channels, the exclusive broadcaster of the tournament, stands out as one of the most significant obstacles, in addition to the large time difference, as most matches are held in the early morning hours due to the United States, Canada, and Mexico co-hosting the tournament.

    In an attempt to alleviate this crisis, the sports channels’ agent in Gaza managed to obtain a special exemption from the network’s headquarters in Qatar, allowing the reactivation of older equipment within the Gaza Strip, taking into account the exceptional circumstances faced by the residents. This exemption was granted for monthly subscriptions ranging between 350 and 420 shekels (US$120-150), providing some cafes and fans with a limited opportunity to watch the matches.

    Alternatives, but Not Enough

    Other alternatives are no more readily available. Free Turkish or Iranian channels may broadcast some matches, but they lack the Arabic commentary that has become a cherished part of the Arab public’s experience with major tournaments.

    On the other hand, IPTV services rely on a stable internet connection, which has become virtually impossible given the extensive damage inflicted on the telecommunications infrastructure during the war.

    Security Concerns Over Renewed Israeli Bombing

    The suffering of Gazans is not limited to material and technical aspects; it also extends to security concerns. Gathering in cafes or public squares to watch matches has become fraught with danger due to the ongoing Israeli bombardment, prompting many to avoid going out at night. Despite this, some cafes continue to broadcast matches at night, even with the possibility of renewed Israeli attacks.

    Despite all these challenges, football remains a rare outlet for many Gazans and a way to cling to life, a temporary attempt to postpone the pain of war and engage, even for a few hours, in a collective joy that restores some semblance of normalcy.

    Since October 8, 2013, Israel, with American and European support, has committed genocide in the Gaza Strip, including killing, starvation, destruction, displacement, and arrests, ignoring international appeals and orders from the International Court of Justice to cease its actions.

    The genocide has left more than 246,000 Palestinians dead and/or wounded, most of them children and women, and more than 11,000 missing, in addition to hundreds of thousands of displaced people and with a famine that claimed the lives of many, most of them children, as well as widespread destruction and the erasure of most of the cities and areas of the Gaza Strip from the map. Quds Press

    Continue reading
    The A, B, C of a Post-Sanctions Iran

    As the Iran-US agreed to a new peace deal on Sunday, questions are being raised on the lifting of sanctions and long-standing restrictions on Tehran.

    US President Donald Trump announced on Sunday that an agreement with Iran had been finalized and that he was authorizing the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and the removal of a US naval blockade.

    The announcement triggered swift diplomatic reactions from European allies, with the UK, Germany, and Italy saying they would continue working closely with Washington, Tehran, and regional partners to maintain momentum toward a longer-term settlement.

    They also signaled a willingness to ease relevant sanctions if Iran takes “clear, verifiable steps” regarding its nuclear program, stating in a joint statement that the country must never “acquire a nuclear weapon.”

    According to an Iranian draft of the agreement reported by Mehr News Agency, the framework includes the suspension of sanctions on Iranian oil exports, petrochemicals, and related products, along with provisions granting Tehran access to financial proceeds from sales.

    The draft also reportedly calls for the release of around $24 billion in frozen Iranian assets during an initial 60-day negotiation period, with half of the funds to be unlocked before formal final talks begin.

    The final agreement would include the full lifting of US primary and secondary sanctions, as well as the termination of relevant UN Security Council and International Atomic Energy Agency Board of Governors resolutions.

    While no details of sanctions relief have been officially released, US sanctions on Iran currently span several areas, including oil exports, banking, shipping, military activities, and nuclear-related programs.

    According to the US government, the country has imposed restrictions on activities with Iran since 1979. It blocks Iranian government assets in the country, bans all trade with Iran, and prohibits foreign assistance and arms sales.

    The US says that its sanctions are “the most extensive and comprehensive set of sanctions” that it maintains on any country, with thousands of persons, including Iranian and non-Iranian, designated for sanctions.

    Apart from the primary sanctions, the US also maintains secondary sanctions, which target non-US companies and individuals that conduct business with Iran.

    Oil and energy sanctions

    The most economically significant restrictions target Iran’s oil industry, the country’s primary source of foreign currency revenue.

    In 2012, then-US President Barack Obama imposed the tightest sanctions against Iran’s oil industry. These included Iranian crude exports, shipping networks, insurance providers, and foreign entities that purchase or transport Iranian oil.

    In 2024, the Stop Harboring Iranian Petroleum Act, or the SHIP Act, was enacted, leading to sanctions against foreign persons that knowingly transport, process, refine, or otherwise deal in petroleum and petroleum products.

    It was enacted to cripple Iran’s energy export revenues by targeting foreign entities and networks that transport, process, or sell Iranian oil.

    Since the Iran war started on Feb. 28, the US has imposed a number of restrictions targeting the Iranian energy industry.

    Its recent sanctions in May included eight vessels involved in ​transporting Iranian crude oil and petroleum products to global markets.

    Earlier in April, the US Treasury Department said it sanctioned more than two dozen individuals, companies, and vessels connected to the network, as well as an alleged financier involved in exchanging Iranian oil for Venezuelan gold to benefit the Lebanese group Hezbollah and Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

    Financial restrictions & frozen assets

    In 1995, then-US President Bill Clinton, under an executive order, established a comprehensive ban on all US investment and trade with Iran.

    Due to US sanctions, Iran remains largely cut off from the global financial system due to US sanctions on major Iranian banks and financial institutions. In 2012, the US imposed unilateral sanctions against the Central Bank of Iran.

    Iranian officials have repeatedly identified access to frozen funds as a key objective in negotiations.

    While the exact amount of Iran’s frozen assets is unclear, official Iranian reports and experts have set the total amount of frozen Iranian assets overseas at more than $100 billion.

    If the sanctions are relaxed, this could include restoring access to international banking channels, easing restrictions on cross-border transactions, and allowing the release of frozen Iranian assets held abroad.

    Shipping and trade

    US sanctions are also imposed on additional sectors of Iran’s economy, including shipping, construction, mining, textiles, automotive, and manufacturing.

    In 2019, sanctions were imposed against Iran’s minerals and metals sectors.

    According to the US government, the property of any person determined by the secretary of the Treasury and the secretary of state to be conducting business operations in the “iron, steel, aluminum, or copper sector of Iran” is blocked.

    On Jan. 10, 2020, sanctions were imposed, targeting Iran’s construction, mining, manufacturing, and textile sectors, including asset freezes and denial of entry into the US for those operating in or providing support for these sectors.

    Western sanctions also affect Iranian shipping companies, ports, and logistics networks.

    Restrictions on maritime transport have complicated Iranian exports and imports, including non-oil trade.

    The reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and the possible lifting of related maritime restrictions were highlighted by both US and Iranian officials following the announcement of the framework agreement.

    Nuclear-related sanctions

    Since 2005, the US has designated Iranian individuals, companies, and organizations for involvement in nuclear proliferation and ballistic missile development.

    US sanctions on Iran also include arms trade to or from Iran, and many components of Iran’s government, including the former supreme leader and IRGC, as well as entities that conduct transactions with or otherwise support them.

    The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2015 had temporarily lifted nuclear-related economic restrictions in exchange for limits on enrichment. However, when the Trump administration withdrew from the JCPOA, it reimposed the sanctions.

    However, significant differences remain between Washington and Tehran over what obligations Iran would undertake.

    US officials have suggested the agreement could involve dismantling elements of Iran’s nuclear program, while Iranian officials have insisted that Tehran has not accepted any new nuclear commitments and that nuclear issues would be discussed in a separate phase of negotiations.

    Continue reading

    You Missed

    World Cup Through Gazan Eyes

    World Cup Through Gazan Eyes

    Yaffa 1934

    Yaffa 1934

    The A, B, C of a Post-Sanctions Iran

    The A, B, C of a Post-Sanctions Iran

    The Orange Seller

    The Orange Seller

    Taleb Al-Rifai No Longer a Kuwaiti

    Taleb Al-Rifai No Longer a Kuwaiti

    Ceasefire And Defeat: Iran Won The War  

    Ceasefire And Defeat: Iran Won The War