Is Smotrich up to His Word?

Ireland Passes Bill to Ban Imports From Israeli Settlements

• CrossFireArabia
• July 8, 2026

The Irish Parliament has passed a bill banning the import of goods from Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories. This a first for a country in the European Union, although its expected economic impact is likely to be limited many argue.

The bill prohibits the import of goods produced in Israeli settlements that are strewn across the occupied West Bank. The bill includes a ban on agricultural, commercial, and other products. The legislation is now scheduled to go to the Senate for final approval before coming into effect.

The Irish government stated that the bill was based on the 2014 advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice, which ruled that Israel’s occupation of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip is illegal under international law.

Ireland continues to take a hard line against the Israeli occupation. It recognized the State of Palestine in 2014 and last month barred Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich from entering the country due to their stances and actions toward activists on the “Global Steadfastness Flotilla.”

For its part, Israel closed its embassy in Dublin at the end of last year, accusing the Irish government of pursuing “hostile policies.”

Dublin has also been calling for a review of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, which forms the basis of trade relations between the two sides. The EU announced last month that it was considering options to restrict trade with settlements, but a lack of consensus among member states prevented further action.

Despite the political implications of the decision, the economic impact of the bill is expected to be limited. Irish imports from Israeli settlements did not exceed €1 million between 2020 and 2024 and were limited to goods such as fruits, vegetables, and timber.

Opposition MPs criticized the bill, arguing that it was insufficient because it did not include trade in services. The government, however, maintained that imposing restrictions on services faced legal complexities and that it preferred to pass actionable legislation at this stage, with the possibility of expanding its scope in the future according to Quds Press.