Ceasefire No: Israel Seeks to ‘Eat’ Into Gaza

As Palestinian factions meet in Cairo to discuss Gaza’s future governance, aid groups and analysts warn that realities on the ground are moving in the opposite direction of the ceasefire framework meant to pave the way for reconstruction and recovery.

While negotiations continue, Israel has expanded its control over large parts of the enclave, strikes have continued, humanitarian access remains severely restricted and reconstruction has yet to begin, leaving Gaza’s more than 2 million residents trapped in a deep humanitarian crisis.

“The implementation of the first phase of the Gaza ceasefire has remained limited and inconsistent, particularly due to repeated airstrikes,” Riham Jafari, advocacy and communications coordinator at ActionAid Palestine, told Anadolu.

Around 1,000 people have been killed and 3,000 injured since the ceasefire began, according to Gaza Health Ministry figures.

In September, US President Donald Trump announced a 20-point plan outlining a framework, with the first phase including a ceasefire and prisoner exchange between Israel and Palestinian factions.

However, implementation of the agreement remains unfulfilled amid ongoing Israeli military operations and mounting humanitarian restrictions.

Israel deepens territorial control

While the ceasefire framework envisioned a gradual Israeli withdrawal, analysts say developments on the ground point in the opposite direction.

Under the Trump plan, Israeli forces initially withdrew to a demarcation known as the Yellow Line, leaving Israel in control of roughly 53% of Gaza’s territory. Since then, Israeli officials have acknowledged expanding their control further.

In May, Israel said it had increased its control to 60% of the Gaza Strip and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he had instructed the military to take control of up to 70%.

Rob Geist Pinfold, a lecturer in international security at the Defence Studies Department at King’s College London, said Israeli policy has focused on maintaining long-term military control while avoiding direct responsibility for Gaza’s population.

“Israel’s plans for Gaza have been remarkably consistent: refuse any direct rule over or responsibility for the territory’s impoverished residents, take and hold as much territory within Gaza as possible whilst emptying it of residents and stop any credible external actor from rebuilding Gaza.”

According to Pinfold, Israel does not need to occupy the entire territory to achieve its objectives.

“Indeed, doing so would be counter-productive for Israel without ethnically cleansing the territory of its 2 million inhabitants, since it would find itself responsible for their welfare,” he said.

Instead, he said, Israel appears to be seeking greater strategic depth through buffer zones and allowing its military to operate freely against perceived threats. The expansion also further entrenches Israel into Gaza and makes future withdrawals less feasible, he added.

“Israel is happy to expand further into the territory, however, as a way to squeeze Hamas and keep the possibility of a comprehensive ‘voluntary migration’ – that is, in fact, not voluntary – open,” he said.

Pinfold argued that Israel has been able to act with impunity as the US focuses on other priorities, including negotiations with Iran.

Jafari said plans to place 70% of Gaza under Israeli control raise serious concerns for Palestinians confined to the remaining territory.

“Such a move would further restrict the already limited space available to civilians, many of whom have been repeatedly displaced during the ongoing conflict and are struggling to access shelter, food, water, healthcare and other essential services,” she said.

Humanitarian promises unfulfilled

Aid agencies say many commitments outlined in the ceasefire framework’s first phase have yet to be implemented.

Under the agreement, Gaza was expected to receive between 500 and 600 aid trucks daily. According to Jafari, actual deliveries have averaged between 150 and 250 trucks a day, with many carrying commercial rather than humanitarian goods.

More than 95% of Gaza’s population depends on humanitarian aid for daily food.

“Aid is being weaponized by obstructing it,” said Jafari.

Humanitarian groups say the consequences extend beyond food shortages.

Large parts of Gaza remain covered in rubble, with bodies still believed to be trapped beneath collapsed buildings. Damaged sewage systems, mounting waste and overcrowded displacement sites have contributed to growing public health concerns.

“Access to safe water is limited, and solid waste is accumulating in residential areas. This is attracting pests and rodents that contaminate food and living spaces and increase cases of illness, particularly among children,” said Jafari.

According to assessments cited by UN agencies, rodents and other pests were reported at roughly 80% of sites hosting displaced families, affecting an estimated 1.45 million people.

Reports from Gaza have shown children and others suffering from rodent bites, large infestations and a growing number of skin conditions like scabies. At the same time, hospitals have limited essential medications to treat those affected.

Despite ongoing mitigation efforts with pesticides, Jafari said that health risks remain high.

Closure of key crossings

Humanitarian organizations say access restrictions continue to hamper relief efforts.

Since May 24, Israeli authorities have kept the Zikim Crossing in northern Gaza closed, leaving Kerem Shalom as the last remaining crossing for approved cargo entering the enclave.

The Rafah crossing between Gaza and Egypt is strictly limited to pedestrian traffic.

“Furthermore, on 1 June, Israeli forces began routing humanitarian convoys through a new road, with a new checkpoint, to reach Kerem Shalom from inside Gaza,” Jafari said.

“As a result, only some of the supplies planned to be collected from Kerem Shalom could be picked up and the volumes of incoming fuel dropped.”

Israel also temporarily closed the Kerem Shalom and Rafah crossings following an Iranian missile attack on June 8 before reopening them in subsequent days.

On Wednesday, the UN said Kerem Shalom had been reopened but congestion and operational limits continued.

Reconstruction remains stalled

Despite reconstruction being a central objective of the ceasefire framework, experts say virtually no rebuilding has begun.

Former UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Adequate Housing Balakrishnan Rajagopal said Gaza’s housing stock and civilian infrastructure remain devastated.

“Housing and civilian infrastructure has been totally destroyed and is still being destroyed, including in Gaza City a few days ago,” he said. “Estimates are that over 90% of the built environment is damaged or destroyed.”

He argued that meaningful reconstruction cannot begin until military operations cease, access restrictions are lifted and supplies can enter Gaza in significantly larger quantities.

“This is a grave situation in terms of violation of international law and a fundamental challenge to the idea of an international community based on rule of law,” Rajagopal said.

CrossFireArabia

CrossFireArabia

Dr. Marwan Asmar holds a PhD from Leeds University and is a freelance writer specializing on the Middle East. He has worked as a journalist since the early 1990s in Jordan and the Gulf countries, and been widely published, including at Albawaba, Gulf News, Al Ghad, World Press Review and others.

Related Posts

The Dress of Ramallah

Palestine Heritage:

The image shows Zahia Merhej wearing the traditional Palestinian dress of Ramallah, accompanied by a traditional pottery jar.

The Embroidered Dress: The dress features intricate hand-embroidery that reflects exceptional craftsmanship and serves as a symbol of Palestinian heritage.

Headcovering: She wears a shawl or an embellished headcovering that drapes over her shoulders.
Beside her stands a pottery jar placed inside a basket—items that were once part of daily life.
#Palestinian_Dress
Coloring is by Mary Abu Assi | Show less

Continue reading
Salman Abu Sitta: Safeguarding Palestinian Memory

Salman Abu Sitta (b. 1937) is a Palestinian researcher born in the city of Beersheba; he is considered one of the researchers most deeply engaged with the issues of Palestinian refugees and the right of return.

Abu Sitta: A Note

Salman Abu Sitta was born in Beersheba, Palestine, in 1937. He earned a Bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering from Cairo University in 1959 and a PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of London in 1964. He is a fellow of the Institution of Structural Engineers (UK), the Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario (Canada), and the American Society of Civil Engineers. He is also a former member of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (UK), the American committee for energy facility specifications, and the executive council for space structures. He has authored over 30 scientific papers and books on engineering and received multiple awards from the British engineering association.

He served as a professor at the University of Western Ontario in Canada and was an independent member of the Palestinian National Council from 1974 until the signing of the Oslo Accords in 1993. Additionally, he was a member of the Palestinian Cooperation body in Geneva, where he chaired the committee on refugees and UNRWA. He has authored more than 80 research papers and articles and published four books on the refugee issue in both Arabic and English. He also designed and illustrated a comprehensive map of all the villages and cities of Palestine, with three-quarters of a million copies distributed in both Arabic and English.

Documenting the Nakba


Abu Sitta spent over 40 years researching information regarding Palestine—both before and after the establishment of Israel. The mission he undertook went beyond merely chronicling the Nakba and documenting Palestine; he also strove to ensure that “the memories and identity of the homeland would never be lost.” Abu Sitta began his documentation work in his thirties after discovering the memoirs of the Turkish commander of Beersheba—which was under Ottoman rule at the time—a document dating back to the early 19th century. “That is where the research began, and it has never stopped since,” he says. “I have continued to gather every scrap of material regarding every inch of my homeland.”

Works
Atlas of Palestine 1917–1966.
The Right of Return: Sacred, Legal, and Feasible (2001), Arab Institute for Research and Publishing.
The Road to Return: A Guide to Displaced and Existing Towns and Villages and Holy Sites in Palestine (2007), Palestine Culture Foundation.
The Nakba Register 1948 (2000), Baheth Center for Studies.
Sources
Geographicus Rare Antique Maps biographical dictionary of cartographers | Salman Abu Sitta (in English), QID: Q133842860.
The Palestinian Return Centre. “Third Return Week” (in English). Archived from the original on 2023-12-12. Retrieved 2023-11-23.
Al Jazeera: Bila Hudood (Without Borders) – Dr. Salman Abu Sitta, October 10, 2007 [Broken link]; archived copy (March 4, 2016).
Interview with Al-Ahram newspaper [Broken link]; archived copy (September 24, 2013).


Continue reading

You Missed

The Dress of Ramallah

The Dress of Ramallah

Salman Abu Sitta: Safeguarding Palestinian Memory

Salman Abu Sitta: Safeguarding Palestinian Memory

Woman From Bethlehem

Woman From Bethlehem

Free Palestine

Free Palestine

Woman of The Vineyards

Woman of The Vineyards

Trumpaplooza! View from Amman

Trumpaplooza! View from Amman