Israel Sprays South Lebanon With Poison

The Israeli army’s spraying of chemical substances over vast agricultural areas in southern Lebanon and Syria is deeply alarming. The deliberate targeting of civilian farmland violates international humanitarian law, particularly the prohibition on attacking or destroying objects indispensable to civilian survival. Large-scale destruction of private property without specific military necessity amounts to a war crime and undermines food security and basic livelihoods in the affected areas.

On the morning of Sunday, 1 February 2026, the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) received notice from the Israeli army of planned aerial activity near the Blue Line and was asked to remain inside shelters. The alert disrupted the mission, leading to the cancellation of more than 10 field activities and the suspension of routine patrols along one-third of the line for over nine hours.

During the period in which international forces were forced to remain inactive, Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor documented Israeli aircraft spraying chemical substances over extensive agricultural areas, particularly in the town of Ayta ash-Shaab and its vicinity in southern Lebanon. This raises the risk of consequences beyond immediate crop damage, posing a serious threat to the rights to health and a safe environment through potential long-term contamination of soil and water resources.

The announcement by Lebanese Environment Minister Tamara Elzein that specialised teams had been dispatched to collect samples from the targeted sites for laboratory analysis reflects official concern about the possible use of internationally prohibited or highly toxic substances.

This incident cannot be viewed in isolation from the scorched-earth policy pursued by the Israeli army. It forms part of a pattern of systematic destruction of agricultural land, including the burning of approximately 9,000 hectares during recent military operations using white phosphorus and incendiary munitions.

The deliberate targeting of the means of life violates the laws of war and appears intended to undermine the living security of residents in the south and render their areas uninhabitable, thereby forcibly displacing them.

Euro-Med Monitor also documented Israeli aircraft spraying pesticides of unknown composition over farmland in the countryside of Quneitra in southern Syria on Monday and Tuesday, 26 and 27 January 2026. The direct targeting of civilian objects caused widespread crop destruction, posing a serious threat to economic and food security and violating farmers’ rights to work and to an adequate standard of living by destroying their primary sources of income without military justification.

The breach of territorial sovereignty and cross-border targeting of agricultural land constitute violations of the United Nations Charter and the principles of international law. The use of chemical substances of unknown composition, given their destructive effects on vegetation and their direct threat to public health, constitutes a grave breach of international humanitarian law, which prohibits methods or means of warfare that cause indiscriminate harm, unnecessary suffering, or widespread, long-term damage to the natural environment.

Such practices expose their perpetrators to international criminal accountability. Under Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, intentionally attacking civilian objects or destroying property without imperative military necessity constitutes a war crime. The use of chemical substances to devastate agricultural land satisfies the material elements of these crimes by inflicting widespread, long-term harm on the natural environment and the foundations of civilian life.

This conduct reflects a systematic operational pattern long implemented by Israel in border areas east and north of the Gaza Strip, where aerial spraying of lethal chemicals has been used to enforce buffer zones by destroying vegetation and dismantling the food basket, despite repeated international warnings about the catastrophic consequences for food security and public health.

Euro-Med Monitor previously documented similar attacks through a comprehensive evidentiary archive supported by laboratory analyses and expert testimony. The findings showed that the substances used were not conventional pesticides but highly toxic chemical compounds with destructive effects that are difficult to contain. The harm extended beyond seasonal crop loss to long-term contamination of soil and groundwater, damage to livestock, and the dismantling of environmental infrastructure, rendering the restoration of agricultural activity nearly impossible. Such conduct constitutes a compounded violation that strikes at the core of the rights to life and to a healthy environment.

Read within the broader context of continued military targeting of agricultural land with various munitions, these incidents reveal a systematic policy of destruction that exceeds any legitimate military objective. The approach appears intended to render agricultural areas uninhabitable by dismantling economic infrastructure and depriving residents of their fundamental means of livelihood. It amounts to collective punishment prohibited under international law and constitutes an unlawful method of pressure designed to create a coercive environment that drives forced displacement by stripping populations of the means necessary for stability and survival.

The international community, particularly the United Nations, must act immediately by establishing an independent fact-finding mission to collect samples from affected soil and crops in southern Lebanon and the countryside of Quneitra, subject them to thorough laboratory analysis, determine the chemical composition of the substances used, assess their toxicity, and evaluate any potential violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention or relevant international environmental protocols, thereby removing doubt about the nature of this targeting.

States Parties to the Geneva Conventions whose national legislation permits the exercise of universal jurisdiction must fulfil their legal obligations by initiating criminal investigations and prosecuting Israeli officials responsible for ordering environmental destruction and the use of weapons with indiscriminate effects. Such acts constitute war crimes and grave breaches not subject to statutes of limitation and require the activation of individual accountability mechanisms against those responsible, wherever they may be found.

The UN Security Council must issue a binding resolution condemning the grave Israeli crimes and consider the obstruction of UNIFIL’s work and its forced withdrawal during the violations a flagrant breach of Resolution 1701. Euro-Med Monitor stresses the need to guarantee farmers and landowners the right to fair compensation for the economic and environmental losses they have sustained, and to obligate Israel, as the aggressor, to bear the costs of land rehabilitation and the remediation of any long-term ecological damage resulting from this contamination.

The Lebanese and Syrian governments should submit formal declarations to the Registry of the International Criminal Court (ICC) under Article 12(3) of the Rome Statute, thereby accepting the Court’s jurisdiction over crimes committed on their territories.

Euro-Med Monitor emphasises that this step is now an urgent necessity to halt the continued policy of impunity and enable the ICC Prosecutor to initiate independent investigations into Israel’s attacks on civilian objects as war crimes whose consequences transcend national borders and threaten human security across the region. The announcement by Lebanese Environment Minister Tamara Elzein that specialised teams had been dispatched to collect samples from the targeted sites for laboratory analysis reflects official concern about the possible use of internationally prohibited or highly toxic substances.

This incident cannot be viewed in isolation from the scorched-earth policy pursued by the Israeli army. It forms part of a pattern of systematic destruction of agricultural land, including the burning of approximately 9,000 hectares during recent military operations using white phosphorus and incendiary munitions.

The deliberate targeting of the means of life violates the laws of war and appears intended to undermine the living security of residents in the south and render their areas uninhabitable, thereby forcibly displacing them.

Euro-Med Monitor also documented Israeli aircraft spraying pesticides of unknown composition over farmland in the countryside of Quneitra in southern Syria on Monday and Tuesday, 26 and 27 January 2026. The direct targeting of civilian objects caused widespread crop destruction, posing a serious threat to economic and food security and violating farmers’ rights to work and to an adequate standard of living by destroying their primary sources of income without military justification.

The breach of territorial sovereignty and cross-border targeting of agricultural land constitute violations of the United Nations Charter and the principles of international law. The use of chemical substances of unknown composition, given their destructive effects on vegetation and their direct threat to public health, constitutes a grave breach of international humanitarian law, which prohibits methods or means of warfare that cause indiscriminate harm, unnecessary suffering, or widespread, long-term damage to the natural environment.

Such practices expose their perpetrators to international criminal accountability. Under Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, intentionally attacking civilian objects or destroying property without imperative military necessity constitutes a war crime. The use of chemical substances to devastate agricultural land satisfies the material elements of these crimes by inflicting widespread, long-term harm on the natural environment and the foundations of civilian life.

This conduct reflects a systematic operational pattern long implemented by Israel in border areas east and north of the Gaza Strip, where aerial spraying of lethal chemicals has been used to enforce buffer zones by destroying vegetation and dismantling the food basket, despite repeated international warnings about the catastrophic consequences for food security and public health.

Euro-Med Monitor previously documented similar attacks through a comprehensive evidentiary archive supported by laboratory analyses and expert testimony. The findings showed that the substances used were not conventional pesticides but highly toxic chemical compounds with destructive effects that are difficult to contain. The harm extended beyond seasonal crop loss to long-term contamination of soil and groundwater, damage to livestock, and the dismantling of environmental infrastructure, rendering the restoration of agricultural activity nearly impossible. Such conduct constitutes a compounded violation that strikes at the core of the rights to life and to a healthy environment.

Read within the broader context of continued military targeting of agricultural land with various munitions, these incidents reveal a systematic policy of destruction that exceeds any legitimate military objective. The approach appears intended to render agricultural areas uninhabitable by dismantling economic infrastructure and depriving residents of their fundamental means of livelihood. It amounts to collective punishment prohibited under international law and constitutes an unlawful method of pressure designed to create a coercive environment that drives forced displacement by stripping populations of the means necessary for stability and survival.

The international community, particularly the United Nations, must act immediately by establishing an independent fact-finding mission to collect samples from affected soil and crops in southern Lebanon and the countryside of Quneitra, subject them to thorough laboratory analysis, determine the chemical composition of the substances used, assess their toxicity, and evaluate any potential violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention or relevant international environmental protocols, thereby removing doubt about the nature of this targeting.

States Parties to the Geneva Conventions whose national legislation permits the exercise of universal jurisdiction must fulfil their legal obligations by initiating criminal investigations and prosecuting Israeli officials responsible for ordering environmental destruction and the use of weapons with indiscriminate effects. Such acts constitute war crimes and grave breaches not subject to statutes of limitation and require the activation of individual accountability mechanisms against those responsible, wherever they may be found.

The UN Security Council must issue a binding resolution condemning the grave Israeli crimes and consider the obstruction of UNIFIL’s work and its forced withdrawal during the violations a flagrant breach of Resolution 1701. Euro-Med Monitor stresses the need to guarantee farmers and landowners the right to fair compensation for the economic and environmental losses they have sustained, and to obligate Israel, as the aggressor, to bear the costs of land rehabilitation and the remediation of any long-term ecological damage resulting from this contamination.

The Lebanese and Syrian governments should submit formal declarations to the Registry of the International Criminal Court (ICC) under Article 12(3) of the Rome Statute, thereby accepting the Court’s jurisdiction over crimes committed on their territories.

Euro-Med Monitor emphasises that this step is now an urgent necessity to halt the continued policy of impunity and enable the ICC Prosecutor to initiate independent investigations into Israel’s attacks on civilian objects as war crimes whose consequences transcend national borders and threaten human security across the region. Euro-Med Monitor

CrossFireArabia

CrossFireArabia

Dr. Marwan Asmar holds a PhD from Leeds University and is a freelance writer specializing on the Middle East. He has worked as a journalist since the early 1990s in Jordan and the Gulf countries, and been widely published, including at Albawaba, Gulf News, Al Ghad, World Press Review and others.

Related Posts

Israel Violated The Ceasefire 4379 Times in 315 Days

CROSSFIREARABIA – Israel has violated the ceasefire 4379 times according to the Government Media Office in Gaza City. It has been 315 days since the Gaza ceasefire was signed on 10 October, 2025. The Office stated since that time Israeli military strikes on the Strip killed 1,286 people and injured 4,257 while 180 arrests were made by the Israeli occupation since that time.

Continue reading
Gaza’s Kites Return — and Israel Katz Threatens Revenge

CROSSFIREARABIA — A handful of balloons and homemade kites drifting out of the Gaza Strip have managed to provoke an extraordinary response from Israel’s defence establishment, with Defence Minister Israel Katz threatening assassinations, forced evacuations and military strikes if the launches continue.

The objects at the centre of the latest confrontation are remarkably primitive.

Israeli media reported that several kites crossed from Gaza into Israeli communities surrounding the Strip in recent days. At least five have reportedly been detected, including one found in Kibbutz Kfar Aza over the weekend.

Significantly, the kites discovered so far were reported not to have been carrying explosives or incendiary material. Israeli reports said they did not pose a danger to residents according to the Jerusalem Post.

That has not stopped Katz from treating them as a major security threat. He announced Sunday he had instructed the army to respond “immediately and forcefully” to balloons, kites or drones crossing from Gaza.

Katz said Israel would regard every such launch as an act of war and made clear that, as far as the Israeli military response was concerned, there would be little distinction between a balloon, a kite and an unmanned aircraft.

“A balloon is treated like a kite, and a kite is treated like a drone, with or without explosives,” Katz said, according to Israeli media, the Israeli daily reported.  

He went considerably further.

Katz threatened action against those Israel believes are responsible for launching the objects, including assassinations. He also raised the possibility of ordering Palestinians to evacuate residential neighbourhoods and of attacking areas Israel claims are being used as launching sites Anadolu Ajansı reported him as saying.

The threat potentially turns an object made from little more than plastic, sticks and string into justification for a much broader military response.

Gaza Disputes the Israeli Account

But there is another side to the story.

Gaza’s Government Media Office, Sunday, rejected the Israeli portrayal of the kites and balloons as organized hostile operations.

Ismail Al-Thawabta, director-general of the office, told the Palestinian Sanad News Agency that the Israeli allegations were unfounded and accused Katz of using them to prepare public opinion for another escalation against Gaza.

According to Al-Thawabta, what Israel is describing as acts of war are, in some cases, simply homemade kites constructed by Gaza’s children from nylon bags and pieces of wood.

Children fly them as one of the few forms of recreation still available amid the devastation and shortages inside Gaza, he said.

The Government Media Office argued that the crude kites largely follow the direction of the wind and cannot be precisely controlled over long distances as another local news agency pointed out.

That distinction is crucial.

Israel is alleging that objects are deliberately being dispatched across the boundary. Gaza officials are saying that children’s kites can simply be caught by the wind and carried beyond the Strip.

Neither claim should automatically be accepted without independent evidence establishing who launched each object and with what intention.

What is established from Israeli reporting, however, is that the kites discovered in recent days were not carrying explosives or incendiary devices as per the Shorouk Arabic website.

An Echo of 2018

The sight of kites crossing the Gaza boundary nevertheless carries powerful memories for Israelis.

During the Great March of Return protests beginning in 2018, Palestinians developed incendiary kites and balloons into an improvised form of protest and resistance. Some carried burning material across the boundary, starting fires in agricultural fields and nature reserves in southern Israel.

The devices were technologically simple but became a surprisingly persistent problem for the Israeli military.

Today’s situation is different in one important respect: The objects reported in the latest incidents have not been found carrying the incendiary or explosive payloads associated with some of the 2018 launches.

Yet the political and military reaction has been immediate.

Katz has effectively established a doctrine under which the distinction between a kite and a drone can disappear once either crosses from Gaza.

A Kite Becomes an “Act of War”

There is a striking imbalance in the language surrounding the episode.

Gaza remains devastated by years of warfare, displacement and destruction. Children there improvise toys from whatever materials can still be found.

Against that background, an object consisting of nylon, wood and string can cross the boundary on the wind and suddenly enter an entirely different world of military terminology: drone, launch site, operator, assassination, evacuation and act of war.

The Gaza Government Media Office says that is precisely the danger.

It argues that depicting children’s homemade kites as a significant military threat could provide Israel with a new justification for attacking civilians and residential areas according to Alray⁠.

Israel, by contrast, says it cannot afford to wait for a kite or balloon to prove dangerous before responding. Katz’s position is that anything deliberately launched from Gaza toward Israeli communities must be treated as a hostile act.

That leaves one central question hanging over the latest confrontation:

Are these deliberate launches from Gaza, as Israel alleges, or are at least some simply children’s kites escaping into the wind, as Gaza officials maintain?

For the moment, publicly available evidence does not settle that question. What it does show is how little is now required to threaten another escalation around Gaza. No missile. No rocket. Not even an explosive.

Just a kite crossing the sky — followed by a defence minister promising assassinations, evacuations and force.

This article is based on information from AI and is reproduced in Crossfirearabia.com

Continue reading

You Missed

Israel Violated The Ceasefire 4379 Times in 315 Days

Israel Violated The Ceasefire 4379 Times in 315 Days

Gaza’s Kites Return — and Israel Katz Threatens Revenge

Gaza’s Kites Return — and Israel Katz Threatens Revenge

Living With The Dead: Gazan Families Forced to Make Homes Among The Graves

Living With The Dead: Gazan Families Forced to Make Homes Among The Graves

Former Jewish PM: Israel Has ‘Lost The United States…’

Former Jewish PM: Israel Has ‘Lost The United States…’

Palestine in Color Dresses

Palestine in Color Dresses

Khan al-Sultan Stands Proud in Jerusalem

  • By marwan
  • August 22, 2026
  • 15 views
Khan al-Sultan Stands Proud in Jerusalem