The US General Who Swallowed His Own Truth

By Jassem Al-Azzawi

General Dan Kaine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, delivered a confidential warning to President Trump with the utmost candor—the kind of candor that democracies rely on and empires routinely ignore. He said: “We don’t have enough ammunition to win this war. It’s not going to be pretty.” This warning wasn’t born of cowardice; it was the last vestige of institutional integrity that still flickers within the halls of American military power.

Trump’s response was that of a circus clown, not a commander-in-chief. Through his “Truth Social” platform—that distorted mirror of American political life—he dismissed the warning with the arrogance of a street vendor, saying: “Oh, no, no, no. If we do it, we’ll win easily.” Thus, a sober assessment became mere publicity, and caution a lie.

But the biggest lie came later. When Kaine’s warning leaked, Trump not only rejected it but completely reversed it. With the confidence of a man who has never been held accountable for anything, he told the American public the general had said the exact opposite—that the United States had plenty of missiles, munitions, and everything else. “That’s not what he said at all,” Trump declared, putting words of false victory in the mouth of a man who had offered only warnings.

And General Cain remained silent

This silence is not just a footnote in this story; it is the story itself. By remaining silent, Cain allowed the American public to absorb the falsehood as truth. He did not say: “No, Mr. President, that’s not what I said.” He did not invoke his oath, nor the soldiers who would pay with their lives for the gap between political rhetoric and logistical reality. He chose the safety of silence over the danger of truth, and in doing so, he betrayed not only himself but the Republic. This is the rot at the heart of American militarism.

As historian Andrew Bacevich has long warned, the professional military has become more of an instrument of imperial ambition than a defender of democratic values, with senior officers more concerned with their next post than with the Constitution they swore to uphold. Kaine’s silence was not a mere slip of the tongue; it was a symptom of a deeper malaise.

The logistical picture Kaine described in private was not theoretical; the calculations were unforgiving.

Current stockpiles of interceptor missiles and precision munitions could not sustain a prolonged air campaign against a country three times the size of Iraq. The Wall Street Journal documented a “worrying gap” in U.S. missile stockpiles, noting that reserves were “far below” the requirements of intensive and sustained operations. Pentagon contractors were instructed to “double or even quadruple” production of Patriot, SM-6, and precision-strike missiles—a tacit admission that the arsenal built for Cold War scenarios is inadequate for the war being fought today.

Consider Gaza: Israel, the most heavily armed military power in the Middle East, with complete air and naval dominance, has turned a tiny coastal strip into a moon-like landscape of devastation over two and a half years, yet it has not broken Hamas. Gaza is only 37 kilometers long. Iran, on the other hand, is a nation of 90 million people, with mountainous terrain, strategic depth, fortified infrastructure, and a combat-hardened Revolutionary Guard. The idea that it will collapse under a few weeks of American airstrikes is not strategy; it is wishful thinking. “God help us if this continues, if it gets to four weeks,” Colonel Daniel Davis warned on the Deep Dive podcast. He was speaking in military terms, and the same prayer applies. Politically.

When Trump now raises the prospect of sending ground troops, he is not escalating from a position of strength, but rather improvising from a position of denial. Admitting that air power and missiles alone cannot achieve the political objective is an admission that the original objective was never honestly assessed. This is the pattern of American wars at the end of an empire: Glittering promises, disastrous calculations, and then a grim and horrific reckoning paid in blood by those who had no seat at the table where the lies were told.


The costs are already piling up—not just in the currency of munitions and riches, but in the currency that empires always ultimately spend and regret most: credibility. America’s word, already devalued by two decades of contrived justifications for war, is getting cheaper by the day.

Democracies can tolerate miscalculations, and they can tolerate bad presidents, but what they cannot long tolerate is the institutionalization of a culture where the truth is whispered behind closed doors and swallowed whole in front of cameras. When the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff allows his words to be weaponized for propaganda — when the man in charge of counting missiles refuses to correct a president who pretends they are plentiful — something far greater than military credibility collapses.

What is crumbling is the social contract between the governed and those who send them to their deaths.

Caine’s silence was not cautious; it was complicity. And in an imperial machine suffering from a shortage of ammunition and a shortage of truth, complicity is the only resource that seems inexhaustible, because when the missiles finally run out, slogans won’t replace them.

Reality will.

Al-Azzawi is an Iraqi writer who contributed this piece to Al Rai Al Youm which was translated and appeared in crossfire.com

CrossFireArabia

CrossFireArabia

Dr. Marwan Asmar holds a PhD from Leeds University and is a freelance writer specializing on the Middle East. He has worked as a journalist since the early 1990s in Jordan and the Gulf countries, and been widely published, including at Albawaba, Gulf News, Al Ghad, World Press Review and others.

Related Posts

Morocco-Israel: Normalization Stops at The Top
  • HebaHeba
  • August 24, 2026

by Mohamed El Metmari

Palestine has always been at the heart of all Moroccan societal and political life. From street art in Chaabi neighborhoods, university student unions, leftist and Islamist political parties, to football chants in Moroccan stadiums, Moroccan solidarity is deeply rooted in a history of shared regional anti-colonial and anti-imperial struggles.

Therefore, Moroccan streets fill with demonstrations whenever Palestinian rights are violated. Moroccans never fail to remind Palestinians of a brotherhood stretching back 750 years, when Salah ad-Din al-Ayyubi named a quarter in Jerusalem the Moroccan Quarter (Ḥārat al-Maghāriba) to commemorate their assistance in reclaiming the city from the Crusaders.

A prime example is the Islamist Justice and Development Party (PJD), which earned much of its credibility in Moroccan streets through marches in solidarity with Palestine. Incorporated into the makhzen state, the party faced significant structural constraints that curtailed its ideological positioning. In December 2020, this culminated in the PJD-led government signing the Abraham Accords on behalf of the state, marking a structural realigning of diplomatic priorities that stood in tension with the party’s historical grassroots platform

Ever since then, Moroccans have never missed a chance to call for an end to normalization: signing petitions, engaging in acts of boycott, and taking to the streets, often at the expense of their own freedom, as the country’s crackdown on dissent has only intensified in the aftermath of COVID. More recently, an investigative report by Forbidden Stories implicated Morocco in the use of Israeli NSO Group’s Pegasus spyware to target journalists and activists.

However, reversing normalization remains far-fetched, as foreign policy in Morocco remains largely concentrated within the monarchy, giving the king a central role in determining the country’s strategic and diplomatic orientation.

Consequently, although signed by the Head of Government, the decision to normalize did not go through the Moroccan Parliament, and the Moroccan people were never consulted. This, however, did not prevent Moroccans from taking to the streets to demand an end to normalization. Moroccan authorities and the media tried their best to promote the benefits of normalization, highlighting Trump’s recognition of Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara while stopping short at mentioning Israel. Instead, Moroccan media focused on showcasing the Moroccan Jewish heritage in preparation for the big reveal.

The American support and recognition of what Morocco considers its first national cause amplified a patriotic narrative which justified normalization, as it asserted that Morocco comes first, even before Palestine. However, to avoid backlash, the royal cabinet issued a statement asserting that Morocco’s obligations towards Palestine remain unchanged, promising that it will keep advocating for a two-state solution.

Nevertheless, many Moroccans remained unconvinced that Trump’s proclamation did not come at the expense of Morocco’s longstanding position on Palestine. Indeed, Israel’s outreach expanded into all critical sectors, including intelligence, trade, agriculture, and even education, with the Ministry of National Education modifying curricula to add more “Jewish elements.” Subsequently, Moroccan official and media rhetoric refrained from commenting on Israeli violations such as the Sheikh Jarrah incidents in East Jerusalem and settler violence in the West Bank, not to mention their failure to condemn Israeli actions in Gaza after October 7, contributing to perceptions of a significant shift in Morocco’s foreign-policy priorities following normalization.

Moroccan people could not remain silent in the face of Israeli crimes, especially in the aftermath of October 7th, when they joined a global outcry denouncing Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza. Throughout the genocide, Morocco could not temporarily sever ties nor even issue condemnation statements, except on one occasion when the Foreign Ministry condemned the violence in the region, stopping short of denouncing Israeli crimes. This response angered many, as it was seen as equating “the victim with the aggressor.”

As Morocco’s official silence increased, the Moroccan Front for Supporting Palestine and Anti-Normalization, a coalition of various leftist, Islamist, and labor entities, emerged as a strong societal player pushing the kingdom to sever ties with Netanyahu’s genocidal state.

In contrast, leading up to October 7th, a number of Moroccan pro-Israel organizations, NGOs, and institutions emerged to support normalization and promote more favorable perceptions of Israel within Moroccan society. Some of these bodies emphasized a ‘Morocco first’ narrative and promoted the view that the Palestinian issue should not take precedence over Morocco’s national interests.

Following the October 7 attacks, some of these actors adopted positions strongly supportive of Israel, while using the events to reinforce arguments in favor of normalization. For instance, Ahmed Charaï, a close figure to the top intelligence and diplomatic tier and the president of the conglomerate Global Media Holding, published a provocative article titled “We Are All Israelis.” In this piece, Charaï denounced Hamas, labeling it a “terrorist” group that needed to be eliminated.

Although this piece sparked fierce backlash within the pro-Palestinian Moroccan community, Ahmed Charaï’s media wings, such as MedRadio, have continued to this day to defend Israel by promoting the “Taza before Gaza” narrative, prioritizing Moroccan interests, where not only is normalization publicly defended by hosts and guests, but the same talking points used by Israeli spokespersons also surface.

After Charaï, other Moroccan pro-Israel civil society entities issued similar statements, indicating the emergence of a more visible pro-Israel current within parts of Moroccan civil society. In a joint statement led by the Moroccan-Israeli Friendship Association (MIFA), October 7 was described as a “black day” for the Jewish people, and Hamas was described as a “Nazi-like” terrorist group. As they failed to address Israel’s war crimes, they asserted its right to attack Gaza and eliminate Hamas as an act of “self-defence.”

The combination of institutional support for pro-normalization voices and increasing restrictions on anti-normalization activists has contributed to a growing perception of a gap between state policy and public opinion.

Crackdowns on pro-Palestine voices started in campuses and universities, which were the first institutions to strike normalization agreements with Israeli counterparts. These developments also raised concerns among critics that Moroccan academia was increasingly becoming a space for normalizing relations with Israel and reducing resistance to Israeli policies within campuses. Indeed, just after the Abraham Accords, there was a rush of conferences to host events praising the diplomatic wins in Western Sahara, asserting that they would not have happened without these monumental agreements, especially as both Israel and the US promised to build consulates in the area.

However, Moroccan universities are also spaces where Moroccan youth first encounter organized pro-Palestinian activism, mainly through leftist and Islamist student unions such as the National Union of Moroccan Students (UNEM). UNEM members have mobilized vigilantly against this Israeli encroachment on their campuses. They have pushed for petitions, attended classes wearing keffiyehs, and even boycotted seminars, such as those of Saad Eddine El Othmani, the PJD leader who signed the Abraham Accords.

Since most academic institutions and universities have formed partnerships with Israeli counterparts, an effective way to circumvent the state’s control over academic spaces is to organize open solidarity conventions and pro-Palestine events on campuses. Against this backdrop, campuses became an important site of contestation over normalization, and authorities increasingly restricted anti-normalization activism there, particularly as students advocated for divestment from Israeli universities.

In July 2024, Morocco’s top university, UM6P, cancelled a graduation ceremony after students planned to wear keffiyehs to the event in solidarity with Gaza. The same year, Abdelmalek Essaadi University closed its doors for four days to prevent students from holding the sixth edition of the Al-Quds Convention. This was not an isolated incident; earlier, in 2022, Ibn Tofail University also shut its doors for three days to block the fifth edition of the same convention, following a violent police crackdown in which three UNEM students were arrested and detained.

As pro-Palestine activism moved from campuses to the streets following the outbreak of the war in Gaza, the state intensified its restrictions on activists. These developments coincided with growing criticism of Morocco’s continued relations with Israel, particularly as reports emerged that ships carrying military supplies to Israel had been permitted to dock at Tanger Med

These developments contributed to growing public perceptions of Moroccan complicity in Israel’s war in Gaza. This indignation only increased with the state’s decision to detain anti-normalization activists, especially those active within the Front. A prominent incident involved 13 activists from BDS Morocco who, according to a recent statement, were sentenced to six months in prison and fined 2,000 MAD each for their involvement in boycotting Carrefour, a company seen as complicit in the Gaza genocide for supplying aid to IOF soldiers.

This reality of detention has already befallen many other activists, especially members of the banned but tolerated Al-Adl Wal-Ihsan group. A prominent example is that of the activist Redouane Al-Kastit, who was sentenced to two years in prison over a Facebook post, an outcome that would have been unthinkable before normalization.

Recently, a 23-year-old young rapper from Taza, of all cities, named Souhaib Qabli (aka L7assal), was detained and sentenced last March to 8 months in prison and fined $106 for the content of his songs, especially a song titled “No to Normalization,” where he clearly criticizes the rulers for their role in normalization.

Despite a brutal genocide and ongoing starvation and siege in Gaza, continuous attacks on Iran and Lebanon, Israel is still deepening its ties with Morocco, branching into deep structures of the Moroccan state.

For the first time, the royals, who hold a sacred position in Moroccan consciousness, were scrutinized for their closeness to Israel, as an investigative report by Le Desk showed that Princesses Lalla Hasnaa and Lalla Asmae have partnered with the Israeli hotel chain Selina amid the ongoing war in Gaza. This comes after André Azoulay, the French-Jewish advisor to the king, was awarded a Presidential Medal of Distinction by Israeli President Isaac Herzog for his peace-building efforts and mediation in the Abaraham accords. 

Moreover, the rise of arbitrary arrests against activist and protestors had led to the state to be alienated from its  people especially after Morocco welcomed members of the Golani Brigades to train on tunnel fighting after they have just come from a brutal massacre they committed in Gaza just two months prior, which involved 15 Palestinian medics, United Nations workers, and ambulance drivers.

Outside the framework of the United Nations, Trump established the Board of Peace to oversee the proposed reconstruction and governance of Gaza in the post-war period. With Trump as its permanent chair, the first countries to join included signatories to the Abraham Accords. As part of its Gaza deradicalization pledges to the Board, Morocco was the first Arab country to send senior military officers to join the Gaza International Stabilization Force, thereby contributing to what critics describe as an indirect Western-led occupation of Gaza.

These developments have also raised concerns among critics that Morocco’s expanding cooperation with Israel may be increasingly at odds with public opinion, particularly as authorities continue to detain activists who oppose normalization. For some Moroccans, this tension is particularly significant because of the kingdom’s religious and political responsibilities toward Jerusalem and its role as chair of the Al-Quds Committee.

Mohamed El Metmari is an independent Moroccan writer, activist, and PhD researcher specializing in Orientalist discourse. His master’s thesis focuses on the Khan Younis and Rafah massacres of 1956. His articles have appeared across various prominent platforms, including Al Jazeera, Raseef22, and The New Arab. He wrote this article for Countercurrents.org

Continue reading
A Middle East Whirlpool! View From Amman

By Saleem Ayoub Quna

Unlike the grey terrain of the Middle East, known for its harsh aridity and barren landscapes, the region’s still-unsettled, multi-front conflicts that erupted after the 7 October, 2023 surprise Palestinian assault on Israeli settlements around Gaza Strip, almost literally, become associated in the public imagination with the colour blue: The sea, its waves, its vessels and its strategic waterways.

The Palestinians called that watershed event Al-Aqsa Flood. Israel described 7 October as a second Holocaust. If the Palestinians deliberately chose the word flood for its religious and symbolic connotations, the Israeli way of describing it, indicated how serious and tough their losses and injuries were.

What followed was a succession of milestones and unprecedented developments across the Middle East. They continue to unfold dramatically, resembling the abrupt and unpredictable movements of hurricanes and tempests on the high seas.

Yet the side-conflicts and mini-wars that followed 7 October have neither followed a single pattern nor obeyed the same rules. Instead, events have moved in different, sometimes opposing directions — unlike the orderly circular motion of an actual whirlpool. It is almost as though every confrontation has chosen a course of its own: The predictable alongside the unpredictable, the rational alongside the seemingly illogical.

It therefore takes more than intelligent guesswork or clever political analysis to determine which direction these events will ultimately take, and which may prove more dangerous — not only to the region and its inhabitants, but also to the many international powers with interests at stake.

If we were to capture the current Middle Eastern scene in a single frame, we might portray it as an extraordinary, almost unbelievable collision of man-made tides, currents and sub-currents, all moving simultaneously through one increasingly turbulent sea.

Because the first shots fired on 7th October around Gaza strip, from a Palestinian point of view, came as a last desperate call and reminder of the injustice they are suffering, they soon found their echoes in the four corners surrounding it: In south Lebanon, Yemen to the south and Iraq and Iran to the east. Even to the west, there were international sailors who belonged to the Peace Flotilla, trying to bring medicine and food to the starving children of Gaza!

One of the most significant currents emerged on Israel’s northern front.

What initially appeared to be a relatively “controlled” confrontation between Israel and Hezbollah steadily intensified until September 2024, when Israel killed the party’s leader Hassan Nasrallah. Only a few months later came another geopolitical earthquake: The collapse of Bashar al-Assad’s government in Damascus in December 2024.

Each development sent another powerful current through the already boiling waters of the wider Middle Eastern whirlpool.

Then came an even larger artificial wave.

In June 2025, the United States launched Operation Midnight Hammer, striking Iran’s three principal nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan while diplomatic efforts surrounding Iran’s nuclear programme were still underway.

Washington described the operation as an attempt to inflict decisive damage on Iran’s nuclear capabilities. Tehran responded with retaliatory action against American military interests in the Gulf.

But that was not the end of the storm.

On 28 February, 2026, the world witnessed another major escalation when the United States and Israel launched coordinated, large-scale attacks against Iran. The two allies acted jointly but gave their military campaigns different names: Washington called its operation Epic Fury, while Israel called its campaign Roaring Lion.

The strikes hit Iranian military infrastructure and senior leadership and inflicted substantial damage. Yet they failed to produce one of the most far-reaching political outcomes sought by US-Israeli advocates of the military campaign: The toppling of the Iranian regime.

And so the whirlpool continued.

Iran responded not simply through missiles and military retaliation, but by shifting the struggle towards one of the most strategically sensitive waterways on earth: The Strait of Hormuz.

Through restrictions on shipping, attacks on vessels and increasingly assertive claims over the waterway, Tehran transformed Hormuz into another major front in the confrontation. The strait — through which a substantial share of the world’s energy supplies traditionally passes — became yet another current dragging regional powers and the wider international community deeper into the turbulence.

Here, the metaphor of the whirlpool becomes more than literary.

Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Yemen, Iraq, the Red Sea, the Arabian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz are no longer easily separable theatres. Each produces currents that flow into the others. A military strike in one location generates political pressure somewhere else; an assassination changes the balance of power hundreds of kilometres away; a blocked shipping lane reverberates through global markets thousands of kilometres beyond the Middle East.

And all the while, new currents are being created faster than old ones can disappear.

What begins on the shores of Gaza does not remain in Gaza. What happens in Beirut, Damascus, Tehran or the Strait of Hormuz does not remain there either.

The Middle Eastern whirlpool has become too wide, too violent and too interconnected to contain its turbulence within the region itself.

And as it keeps spinning, its waves will continue to splash far beyond the shores of the Middle East — reaching, sooner or later, virtually every corner of the globe.

Conclusion: As long as the waters surrounding the Middle East remain crowded with warships, missiles, blockades, retaliatory strikes and the debris of foreign intervention, the region’s old whirlpool will continue to spin.

Continue reading

You Missed

Morocco-Israel: Normalization Stops at The Top

  • By Heba
  • August 24, 2026
  • 4 views
Morocco-Israel: Normalization Stops at The Top

Albanese Calls For World Force to Protect Civilians in Gaza, West Bank

Albanese Calls For World Force to Protect Civilians in Gaza, West Bank

40 Million Tons of Rubble: Gaza Ministry Faces Challenges in Removing it

40 Million Tons of Rubble: Gaza Ministry Faces Challenges in Removing it

Join The Queue For The Drops

Join The Queue For The Drops

‘My Way Out of Insanity’

‘My Way Out of Insanity’

The Child, Tree and The Dark

The Child, Tree and The Dark