Malak: Story of a Champion Boxer Killed in Gaza

By Ismael Al Sharif

America did not come to liberate us, but rather replaced one darkness with another, and destroyed what remained of our dignity – Malalai Joya, an Afghani writer

When the USA launched its war on Afghanistan in 2001, the slogan it used was “saving Afghan women” as one of the main justifications for the invasion to gain popular support.

Stereotypes remain ingrained in memory: Veiled women deprived of the most basic rights, living under the oppressive Taliban regime, and in desperate need of a “savior” from overseas.

However, the reality was far different, as testimonies from international women’s organizations then confirmed.

Afghan women did not ask for military intervention as their basic needs were clear: Safety, livelihood to feed their children, basic health services, and safe shelter. Simple human needs were taken from them in the name of the alleged “liberation.”

The rogue state has since followed the same American approach when it launched its aggression on Iran, it claimed to defend oppressed women, and repeated the same regarding Syria.

Biased Western media, aided by opportunistic feminist organizations, rushed to publish misleading reports about the “suffering of women” in Gaza before the Al-Aqsa Intifada, allowing the Zionist entity leaders to issue shocking statements, claiming the ongoing genocide in Gaza aims to… “liberate women.”

Falsity of claims

Malak’s story exposes the falsity of these claims and lay bare their painful truth.

At the age of 20, Malak Musleh harbored a dream that weighed as much as nations: To stand in the international boxing ring, holding the name of Palestine high. She trained with a slim body and an iron will, and fought dozens of local battles. Little did she know her true battle would be against a million-dollar, western-manufactured missile fired at her while she sat in a Gaza beach café, devastating a girl who had not had enough training to avoid the fatal blow.

In YouTube footage, Malak is seen training with her friends on the same beach in worn-out gloves, improvised punching bags, and bodies defying hunger, bombardment, and displacement. Behind them is a scene epitomizing Gaza: Rubble towering above a sky open to the world’s wounds.

Their training wasn’t an ordinary sport but a dance on the brink of death, a fistful of life in the face of the extermination machine. The sight of them training with the most basic means, carrying punching bags for each other, surpasses sincerity and impact in all of the dramatic works and artificial heroics produced by the Hollywood film industry.

The solid will and human dignity of these girls far surpasses all the fictional heroic stories produced in film studios.

Before Gaza was transformed into a war zone, Malak and her 40 friends trained at the Al-Mashtal Club, the first Palestinian women’s boxing gym. Simple walls adorned with pictures of world champions, and a small arena that nurtured dreams larger than its space.

This was until the occupation came and destroyed them, just as it destroys everything that symbolizes life there. However, the bags hanging on the remains of the walls did not fall; instead, they were transported to the beach, where the girls continued their training under the bombardment, as if to say to the world:

“Even if you turn us to ashes, we will remain roots that will grow again.” The Zionist war machine failed to break the resolve of these young women even after the destruction of their sports club. They continued their training on the open beach, on the soft sand, under the scorching sun that scorched their faces, stealing moments of hope and joy amidst an ocean of endless horrors and tragedies.

Even after the martyrdom of their heroine, Malak, her companions still train in the same spot on the beach, continuing their courageous defiance in the face of the destructive Zionist-American war machine. The short but luminous journey of the late heroine, Malak, teaches us profound human lessons.

First, women in the Muslim world live dignified and free lives, contrary to the misleading Western media propaganda machine. She also quietly exposed the silence of “feminist” organizations that scream when a Western girl is killed in a trivial incident.

We also learned that despite the abject poverty, harsh deprivation, and persistent hunger, there remains in Gaza a people who love life and carry in their hearts legitimate hopes, aspirations, and dreams… just like all the free peoples of the earth.

With Malak’s untimely passing, not only were the dreams of a promising girl buried, but a devastating blow was also dealt to all the noble human values that this hypocritical world so brags about. Malak departed to her Creator, but what remains is the shameful silence of international organizations, the blatant complicity of the international community, and the shame of the onlookers who have been content to play the role of passive observers.

Today, as Palestine is reduced to the numbers of victims, Malak reminds us that beneath every number lies a love story of life, a dream that was not killed because it became fuel for other dreams. Every morning, her companions return to the shore, punching the air as they punch the world’s pain, renewing their oath: That the land of Gaza will be watered either with the tears of survivors or the blood of martyrs.

As to that million-ton rocket? The Israeli who fired it may not have realized that by killing Malak, he had turned her fist into a legend that confounded his calculations: How could a highly sophisticated weapon be defeated by the determination of a girl whose dream had not yet been fulfilled?

This is a translated piece written by Ismail Al Sharif and published in the Arabic Addustour newspaper in Amman.

Continue reading
How is an Extremist Marketed in Syria?

As the Syrian regime collapsed, Israel shifted its efforts towards redrawing the security geography and penetrating deeper into Syrian territory in an attempt to establish a future reality where some strategic Syrian land would remain under Israeli control and surveillance. These efforts included targeting Syria’s military infrastructure and dismantling its army’s arsenal, with the aim of creating a demilitarised Syria and rendering its geography unusable in any future equation that might target Israel.

While the world has been preoccupied with tracking the movements of the leader of Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), Abu Mohammad al-Jolani (Ahmad al-Sharaa), his transformation in presence and rhetoric has drawn attention. This appears to be part of a strategy to market him as a suitable political option for the next stage. Despite his repeated assertions about respecting diversity within Syrian society, maintaining the country’s unity, and ensuring a democratic transition, doubts remain about HTS’s ability to translate these statements into practical action.

Al-Jolani, who currently leads the Syrian scene as a figure representing an ideological stance, may face serious challenges in accepting others, managing differences, or embracing the principle of power-sharing. His initial steps, forming a homogeneous government and attempting to dominate power, indicate a lack of a genuine strategy to address Syria’s social complexities and political legacy. The regime’s collapse may lead to significant difficulties in dealing with this legacy, both in its security and bureaucratic aspects. Such an approach could provoke expected reactions from various internal factions, such as the Druze and Kurds, or even within Idlib itself, who see this monopolisation of political decisions as a threat to their interests and future.

While simplifying al-Jolani and HTS’s rise to power by emphasising the oppressive image of the previous regime may make the Syrian scene appear clearer, the complexity of the current reality cannot be ignored. International support from the US and regional backing from Turkey may not fully guarantee a political transition, as the real challenge lies in how HTS handles extending its influence over the entirety of Syrian territory, a goal yet to be achieved. Additionally, integrating all segments of Syrian society into a national project remains nearly impossible for an ideologically driven organisation that struggles to embrace political diversity or power-sharing principles.

In recent years, the Biden administration took a notable step in Afghanistan by withdrawing and leaving the country to the Taliban, later marketed desperately as a reformed, moderate movement. Today, this phenomenon is being repeated with HTS, as promises to remove it from the terrorist list, distinguish it from other extremist groups, and present al-Jolani as a progressive, politically competent figure gain traction. However, removing HTS from the terrorist list warrants careful consideration of the potential repercussions. Most extremist groups may adopt escalation and rebellion as a primary strategy in the coming phase, particularly in their competition with each other and in their efforts to gain recognition as viable governing entities. This trend could extend beyond Syria’s borders.

Additionally, this development may reignite aspirations among Islamic parties, which retreated after the Arab Spring, to resume their pursuit of power. The symbolism of certain actions since the Syrian regime’s collapse, such as al-Jolani’s speech at the Umayyad Mosque, framing the event as a victory for the Islamic nation rather than a triumph for Syria’s opposition, and the newly appointed Prime Minister Mohammad al-Bashir delivering his first address from a Friday sermon pulpit at the same mosque, reflects an ideological agenda being marketed as the product of a political rather than religious revolution.

Political transition in Syria remains a challenging and complex process due to historical, social, economic and institutional factors. The risk of internal conflict remains significant, as many Syrian factions have yet to express their stance or acceptance of current developments. Furthermore, ceding control of their areas of influence will not be easy. The position of Daesh also remains ambiguous, with its movements since the regime’s fall unclear.

The region may be on the brink of significant repercussions resulting from what has happened and how things will develop in Syria, both politically and in terms of security. The next phase may also see Israel advancing practical measures on the ground before the Trump administration returns to the White House, including annexing areas of the West Bank, securing its borders with Lebanon and Syria, and striking farther targets which Israel considers to be fronts of Iranian influence extending from Iraq to Yemen and even inside Iran.

Dr Amer Al Sabaileh, a professor in the University of Jordan, is a columnist in The Jordan Times

Continue reading