Tehran is Ready For Nuclear Accord – Deputy FM

Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht-Ravanchi said on Tuesday that Tehran is ready to reach a nuclear agreement with Washington “as soon as possible” as the two sides prepare for a new round of negotiations in Geneva.

Iran will do “whatever is necessary” to make that happen, Takht-Ravanchi, a member of Iran’s negotiating team, said in an interview with the US broadcaster NPR.

He said the Iranian delegation will enter the negotiating room in Geneva with “full sincerity and good faith,” while hoping the goodwill will be reciprocated by the Americans according to Anadolu.

“If there is political will on all sides, I believe an agreement can be reached very quickly,” he said.

A veteran diplomat and former Iranian ambassador to the United Nations, Takht-Ravanchi was also involved in the negotiations that led to the landmark nuclear deal in 2015.

Iran and the US have held two rounds of indirect nuclear negotiations under Omani mediation since last month, following efforts by regional countries, particularly Türkiye, to revive nuclear diplomacy that was suspended after the US-backed Israeli attack last June.

Following the last round of talks in Geneva, both sides expressed optimism and said they had agreed on “guiding principles” that could pave the way for a potential agreement.

The deputy foreign minister said they intend to continue indirect talks with the American side in Geneva “within the same framework” as in Muscat and Geneva.

On whether a draft proposal being prepared by Iran will include matters beyond the nuclear issue, Takht-Ravanchi said the subject of the negotiations will remain the nuclear issue, and that is “agreed upon by all parties.”

He further stressed that a war would be impossible to contain once it starts, describing it as a “real gamble” from Tehran’s perspective.

“Let us focus on diplomacy, because diplomacy will benefit everyone. There is no military solution to Iran’s nuclear file,” he said, warning that the entire region would suffer the consequences of war if it breaks out.

The senior diplomat also dismissed speculations that Iran would attack its neighbors, such as the United Arab Emirates or Saudi Arabia, in the event of war, saying Iran would instead target US assets in the region.

The ongoing talks between Tehran and Washington come amid a massive US military buildup in the Gulf region and President Donald Trump’s threat to take military action if the nuclear talks fail.

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has held several military drills as part of preparations for any potential war.

Continue reading
Expert: Iran Gets Ready For an Imminent Attack

Military strategic expert Nidal Abu Zeid stated that Iran has activated its multi-layered command structure, indicating it fears that its top leaders could well be targeted. He explained that Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has entrusted his advisor, Ali Larijani, with assuming command in the event of an attack, and has instructed various leaders to establish four alternative layers to prevent a collapse of the decision-making chain.

In his interview with Jordan 24, Abu Zeid pointed out that this move signifies Iran’s shift from centralized command to decentralized decision-making, ensuring the continuity of state and military administration during what he described as the “critical 48 hours” in the event of a surprise attack.

Abu Zeid believes the photograph released by the White House of the dinner that brought together US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth—both among the most ardent advocates of escalating tensions with Iran—reflects the outlines of a decision that may lean towards a military option. He added that Thursday’s meeting is still on, but that US President Donald Trump’s request for a draft negotiating framework 48 hours before the meeting may be part of a deceptive tactic aimed at achieving the element of surprise. This timeframe, he believes, is also sufficient for the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford to arrive at the port of Haifa.

Abu Zeid suggested that Trump might decide to launch a limited military strike while keeping the door open for negotiations, in order to pressure Tehran into making concessions during the upcoming meeting. He anticipates that the Iranian response will remain “restrained” if Tehran is assured that its leaders will not be targeted in the initial wave of strikes.

However, he warned that if Iran remains intransigent regarding Washington’s conditions, the US strike could expand to include high-value targets, including prominent leaders.

Continue reading
50,000 Perform Isha, Taraweeh Prayers in Al Aqsa

Approximately 50,000 worshippers performed the Isha and Ramadan Taraweeh prayers, Sunday, evening at the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound in Jerusalem, despite restrictions and heightened measures imposed by the Israeli occupation on worshippers’ access.

The Jerusalem Governorate said in a brief statement that tens of thousands of worshippers flocked to Al-Aqsa Mosque and performed the prayers in a spiritual atmosphere, despite Israeli military checkpoints and identity checks at the mosque’s gates.

Israeli forces have intensified their military presence in Jerusalem and its surroundings, including at the gates of the Al-Aqsa Mosque, in an attempt to restrict worshippers’ access.

According to the Governorate, over the past few days, more than 300 Jerusalemites were handed orders barring them from entering Al-Aqsa Mosque during the holy month of Ramadan, according to Wafa.

Continue reading
Barghouti: ‘Huckabee Should Resign For US Credibility’

The Secretary-General of the Palestinian National Initiative, Dr. Mustafa Barghouti, stated the recent remarks by US Ambassador Huckabee in Tel Aviv reveal – as he described them – “dangerous convictions” and clear support for the so-called “Greater Israel” project, considering this proposal to be in conflict with the foundations of peace and international and humanitarian law.

Barghouti affirmed to Jordan 24 that the positions attributed to Huckabee reflect an ideological bias that is “racist and anti-peace,” and encourage the undermining of opportunities for a political solution, especially in light of the ongoing tensions in the Palestinian territories. He emphasized that any support for expansionist projects contradicts international law and deepens the instability in the region.

He added that the US administration must take a clear stance regarding these statements, considering that Huckabee’s continued presence in his position after these statements “sends a negative message” to peace efforts. He called for him to be “forced to resign” and held politically accountable, in order to preserve what remains of the credibility of the US role in the political process.

Barghouti concluded by emphasizing that the Palestinian people will continue their political and diplomatic struggle in international forums to confront any projects aimed at entrenching or legitimizing the occupation, calling on the international community to bear its legal and moral responsibilities.

Continue reading
Expert Slams Huckabee’s Remarks on Israel’s Right to The Middle East

Military strategic expert Nidal Abu Zeid has stated that the remarks of US Ambassador in Tel Aviv, Mike Huckabee, regarding what he termed as “Israel’s right to control the Middle East, including Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan” is a biblical inference that intersects with an expansionist political agenda. He added these remarks are inseparable from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s previous statements on the Arabic-language channel i24NEWS about the “Greater Israel” project.

Abu Zeid told Jordan 24 that this approach also aligns with statements made by US President Donald Trump at the beginning of his term, when he referred to Israel as “small in a vast geographical area.” He believes that the convergence of these positions indicates a tacit US approval for Israeli expansionist ambitions at the expense of the neighboring countries.

He noted Huckabee’s remarks came during a meeting with American journalist Tucker Carlson, following a debate between them on social media. This debate culminated in an agreement to engage in a public media confrontation, which sparked widespread controversy in Arab circles and official condemnation from Jordan, Egypt, and several other Arab states.

Abu Zeid explained that the occupation, according to his analysis, seeks to impose a fait accompli policy starting from Ras al-Naqoura in Lebanon, passing through Mount Hermon and southwestern Syria, and reaching the West Bank, relying on a set of settlement laws aimed at consolidating control over the land.

In this context, Abu Zeid recalled the story of the late Abdul Razzaq al-Rahahleh, a native of Salt, who served as the Director of Jerusalem Lands in 1967. After the occupation seized the West Bank, he managed to preserve the land documents for the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood and hand them over to the Jordanian authorities at the time, which later contributed to establishing Palestinian ownership of the neighborhood’s land.

Abu Zeid concluded by saying that between Huckabee’s statements and the documents of the Salt native, the legal and historical truth remains: The land belongs to its rightful owners, and documented rights do not expire with time nor can they be nullified by political pronouncements. He asked: “How can someone who does not own the land give away what he does not deserve?”

Continue reading