In Gaza, Even the Tent Is Temporary: Families Who Have Fled 5, 10, 15 Times

CROSSFIREARABIA – By the time many Palestinians in Gaza reach a tent, they have already fled several times — from home to relatives, from schools to hospitals, from Gaza City to Khan Younis, from Khan Younis to Rafah, and often back again. For families who have moved 10 or 15 times, displacement is no longer a single traumatic event. It has become a way of life.

At two o’clock in the morning, the explosions were getting closer.

Windows collapsed inward. Children woke terrified. Outside, the sound of Israeli tanks and military vehicles appeared to be moving nearer.

The father tried to calm his children, but there was little time for reassurance. The family had to leave.

Again.

Palestinian writer Saber Abu al-Kass later described that night in an account published by Al Jazeera as the beginning of yet another forced displacement. They abandoned what remained behind them and fled into a darkness punctuated by explosions.

It is a scene that has repeated itself hundreds of thousands of times across Gaza: Parents waking sleeping children; the elderly being helped onto carts or wheelchairs; mattresses rolled hurriedly; a bag of clothes grabbed if there is time; documents, blankets, water and food taken if they can be found.

And then the walk begins.

Not knowing where it will end.

For many Gazans, asking where they are displaced today no longer tells their story. The more revealing question is: How many times have you already been displaced?

Ten times.

Eleven.

Twelve.

Fifteen.

In July 2024, Palestinians interviewed by Al Jazeera were already struggling to count. One man, carrying a child and belongings through the street, said his family had fled 10 times.

“Every time there is suffering,” he said. “We don’t know where to go.”

A girl told the channel that her family was fleeing for the seventh time. Another man counted nine displacements and said he had reached the point where he wished he had stopped running.

United Nations estimates cited in the same report said roughly nine out of every 10 people in Gaza had been displaced at least once — around 1.9 million people — with many uprooted repeatedly.

But statistics cannot quite convey what it means to move 10 times during a war.

Every journey begins with a calculation no parent should have to make: Is remaining here more dangerous than putting the children on the road?

“We barely put up the tent”

For Abir Nasr, there was sometimes barely enough time to turn a patch of ground into a temporary home before she had to dismantle it.

Nasr and her family were repeatedly displaced from Khan Younis toward Rafah. Speaking to Al Jazeera in January 2024, she summed up their existence in a few words:

“We barely manage to put up the tent and sit in it.”

During one displacement from the Mawasi area of Khan Younis, she recalled gunfire and people being killed nearby. The family fled with their children in the middle of a cold winter night.

Her brother Ali Nasr was undertaking his fifth displacement.

“They attacked us in the middle of the night,” he said.

They did not know where to go.

That uncertainty is central to Gaza’s displacement story. People are not generally leaving one dangerous location for a prepared shelter. They may be moving toward a road, a school already overflowing with displaced people, the courtyard of a hospital, an empty plot, a relative’s crowded room — or a strip of sand where they hope they can erect a tent.

Eleven escapes from death

For Lamis Deeb, displacement became almost a map of the war itself.

She fled approximately 11 times.

Seven of those moves took place within Gaza City alone.

Her family’s first flight was from their home to Shati refugee camp in western Gaza. From there they went east within the city. Later, in November 2023, she and her husband headed south toward Khan Younis.

Each movement meant roads damaged by bombardment, crowds of frightened people, military checkpoints and the frantic search at the other end for somewhere — anywhere — to sleep.

Lamis described displacement as if the soul were leaving the body.

“You carry your children, hold them tightly and run,” she told Al Jazeera.

You do not know what is behind you, she said, and you do not know where you are going.

“You just run.”

The war would take more from her than her home. Lamis lost her husband and her father in an Israeli air strike. She was eventually left struggling to survive with her two children.

Her 11 displacements therefore cannot be understood simply as changes of address. They represent eleven episodes of fear, eleven searches for shelter and repeated ruptures of whatever temporary routine she had managed to rebuild for her children.

Fifteen moves — and a library in a tent

Mohammed Saad has moved approximately 15 times with his family.

Before the war, books were part of the physical architecture of his life. His four-storey home included a book warehouse.

Then the house was destroyed.

After months of moving across Gaza, Saad eventually found himself beside a pavement in Deir al-Balah with a modest tent. Yet even there, after 15 displacements, he tried to restore something from his former existence.

For three days, he returned to the ruins and dug with his bare hands to rescue hundreds of books.

His new library was a tent.

The image is almost a metaphor for displacement in Gaza: A man retrieving books from the remains of a permanent house and arranging what survived beside a structure made of fabric and poles — something that can disappear with the next evacuation order, strike, storm or forced movement.

The story of young Hayat Abu Amsha carries the same number: 15 displacements.

Her family’s home was destroyed and she ended up living in a tent lacking basic necessities. Yet in June 2026, the Palestinian child attracted attention for something very different: Playing a violin outside that tent.

The instrument was almost absurdly delicate against the landscape around her.

Fifteen moves had not extinguished her desire to learn music.

Twelve displacements, illness and burning tents

For another displaced man identified as Ziad, the number was 12.

His displacement began on the first day of the war. His home was eventually destroyed. His family scattered.

His married daughter was wounded by shrapnel when an Israeli strike hit a shelter area.

Then the family’s tents in Khan Younis were struck by flying shrapnel and caught fire.

They lost what was inside.

This is one of the cruellest dimensions of repeated displacement. People often arrive at a tent having already lost their houses, furniture and possessions. What remains — blankets, clothes, cooking utensils, perhaps jewellery or family papers — becomes a household compressed into a handful of objects.

When a tent burns, floods or must be abandoned, they can lose their lives a second time in miniature.

Ziad warned that the combination of killing, fear and displacement would have long-term consequences for Gaza’s mental health.

The displacement ends on the map, perhaps.

Psychologically, it does not.

A pregnant woman walking south

For May Younis, three displacements were enough to place enormous strain on her body.

Pregnant during the war, she first walked for long distances from Gaza toward the central area before finding transportation to Khan Younis.

Then she fled again, on foot to Rafah.

Later came another journey, from Rafah to Deir al-Balah.

She sought treatment for intermittent bleeding. According to her account to the Palestine Information Center, medical staff linked her difficulties to poor nutrition and repeated displacement and warned about the risk of premature birth.

For pregnant women, elderly people, people with disabilities and parents carrying infants, evacuation is not merely movement. A few kilometres can become an ordeal.

People walk while dehydrated and hungry. Parents carry children who cannot walk farther. Older people are transported in wheelchairs, on improvised carts or supported between relatives.

And everyone hears the same sounds around them: drones, explosions, artillery and aircraft.

Ten moves — then insects invade the tent

Even reaching Mawasi does not necessarily end the search for somewhere livable.

Um Mohammed Abu Shaeira, 50, originally from Rafah, told the Palestine Information Center that she had changed location ten times.

Some of those later movements were not only attempts to escape military danger.

They were attempts to escape the conditions inside displacement camps themselves.

Fleas, mosquitoes and flies had spread through tents amid accumulated rubbish, sewage problems and the lack of sanitation and insecticides.

“I no longer know where to flee,” she said.

Nearby, Mervat al-Shaer, 35, described spending nights using her own hands to drive mosquitoes away from her children because her deteriorating tent offered so little protection.

The destination of displacement had itself become another place from which people wanted to escape.

The elderly reach the point of refusing to run

By August 2025, exhaustion had transformed the way some displaced people spoke about evacuation.

In western Gaza City, Um Nasser al-Wadiya, a woman in her seventies with failing eyesight and hearing, sat beside a tent assembled from worn pieces of fabric.

She had fled Zeitoun.

Three weeks later she had to leave again, this time from the Karama area.

She then left a tent she had established in Deir al-Balah and eventually reached another improvised camp.

Her children were no longer with her, and she did not know where they were.

Her conclusion was stark:

“Death is easier than displacement.”

Nearby, Fatima al-Qassas, around 60, had fled the Daraj neighbourhood after an evacuation warning. She went to Zeitoun. Bombardment followed her there and she was displaced again.

She, too, said she would not leave again.

For younger people, displacement can mean carrying what remains of a household.

For the elderly, it can mean being physically uprooted when the body is no longer capable of another journey — losing familiar neighbours, medicines, mattresses and whatever small arrangements had allowed them to survive.

Eventually, the terror of the next journey competes with the terror of staying.

Near Mawasi, Yusuf al-Najjar, a father of four, described being displaced three times in only two weeks.

He sat watching the sky.

The family had escaped bombardment repeatedly only to feel encircled by danger again.

That is why the word “safe” has acquired an almost bitter meaning among many displaced Gazans.

A tent is not an address

Mawasi was once known primarily for agriculture. During the war, its sandy coastal landscape became one of Gaza’s largest concentrations of tents.

Families built shelters from tarpaulin, plastic, blankets and salvaged timber. Toilets, clean water, sewage infrastructure and electricity were grossly inadequate for the huge displaced population.

And the danger did not stop at the edge of the encampments.

The Palestine Information Center has documented repeated Israeli attacks in the Mawasi area and the continuing struggle of displaced families to obtain water.

Weather provides another form of displacement.

In November 2024, heavy rain and wind damaged or flooded around 10,000 tents, according to accounts cited by Al Jazeera, forcing some families to move their shelters yet again.

By August 2026, local reporting was still documenting the consequences of prolonged tent life: respiratory and skin diseases, mosquitoes, poor sanitation and children suffering in conditions their parents could do little to change. One mother, Feryal al-Attar, had endured 12 displacements while trying to care for her daughter Haneen, a child with serious existing medical needs who subsequently developed a severe skin condition.

This is what makes Gaza’s tent cities different from the conventional image of a refugee camp.

A refugee camp suggests arrival.

For many Gazans, there has been no arrival.

There is only a temporary stopping point.

A family may drive wooden stakes into the sand, tie down a tarpaulin, spread blankets, find a bucket for water and begin calling the space “our tent.”

Children learn which tent belongs to their cousins. A mother creates a cooking corner. Someone hangs clothes on a rope. A father searches for cardboard to cover the ground.

Small routines return.

For a few days, perhaps even weeks, the family begins to behave as if this patch of earth is fixed.

But the bags are never entirely metaphorical.

They know how quickly life can be reduced again to what can be carried.

Mohammed Saad reached his tent after around fifteen moves.

Lamis Deeb fled eleven times.

Ziad fled twelve.

Abir and Ali Nasr reached a fifth displacement while escaping in the middle of a winter night.

Um Mohammed Abu Shaeira counted ten.

May Younis walked through three.

Maysara Baroud, the Gaza artist who continued drawing during the war after his home, studio and university were destroyed, had been displaced 11 times.

Each number represents doors closed behind people who did not know whether they would ever return.

Perhaps that is the most devastating thing about displacement in Gaza.

The tragedy is not simply that so many people live in tents.

It is that after five, ten or fifteen forced journeys, even the tent cannot fully become home.

At night parents still listen to the sky.

Children still wake at explosions.

An elderly woman wonders whether she has the strength to walk again.

And beside the entrance, the few possessions that survived the last journey remain close enough to gather quickly — because in Gaza, after so many displacements, people have learned that the place where they sleep tonight may once again become the place they have to flee tomorrow.

Continue reading
Israeli Gunboats Fire at, Injure 5 Gaza Fishermen

The sea, which Gaza fishermen traditionally frequent to provide for their families, has remained hazardous and not safe even after the 10 October, 2025 ceasefire was declared. Early Monday morning, five Palestinian fishermen were wounded by Israeli gunboats gunfire while working off the coast of Gaza City. This incident adds to a long list of attacks targeting fishermen.

The Palestinian Red Crescent Society reported that its crew transported five wounded fishermen from the Gaza port area. Three were taken to the Society’s field hospital, Al-Saraya, while the other two were transferred to Al-Shifa Hospital for treatment.

The fishermen were injured while working off the coast of Gaza City after Israeli gunboats opened fire on their boats.

Livelihood Under Fire

The Palestinian Ministry of Agriculture stated that the attack represents another instance of the repeated targeting of fishermen and is part of a policy aimed at cutting off the livelihoods of those working in the maritime and agricultural sectors and depriving them of their most basic rights.

The Ministry stated that the attacks have transformed fishing, a vital source of income for many Palestinian families, into a life-threatening activity for those working at sea. It called upon human rights and international organizations to intervene, halt these violations, and provide protection for fishermen and farmers.

Thus, Gazan fishermen no longer go to sea solely to face the difficulties of fishing, fuel and equipment shortages, and damaged boats, but also the risk of being shot at, at a time when job opportunities and income sources have become extremely limited in the Gaza Strip.

They are not the first victims. United Nations data reveals that today’s incident is not an isolated one but part of a continuing pattern of attacks and restrictions targeting the fishing sector in Gaza.

In a previous report, the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) cited the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) as documenting 28 attacks on fishermen and fishing sites between 7 October, 2023, and 31 December, 2024. The Palestinian Ministry of Agriculture stated that, as of 11 December, 2024, the Israeli army killed approximately 200 fishermen and workers in the fishing sector, out of nearly 6,000 who were employed in this profession before the war.

During the period from 1 January to 16 May, 2025, the OHCHR documented 28 incidents against fishermen, resulting in the deaths of 11 fishermen and injuries to 34 others, in addition to the brief detention of two fishermen before their release.

These figures indicate that targeting fishermen was not a phenomenon limited to the early days of the war, but continued afterward through gunfire, restrictions on access to the sea, and the destruction of fishing equipment.

In its June 2026 report, OCHA stated that access to the sea remained prohibited and fishing activities were effectively restricted, depriving fishermen of their livelihoods and limiting the chances of early economic recovery in the sector. The report also noted the continued occurrence of Israeli gunfire incidents near fishermen or on the shore.

OCHA emphasizes that the restrictions on access to the sea are part of broader restrictions on livelihoods in Gaza, including limitations on access to agricultural land, movement, and the entry of essential goods and supplies.

For the fishermen, the injury of five of their colleagues is not just another incident; it means that going out to sea in search of food and income can end in injury, the loss of their boat, or the loss of their livelihood.

Thus, the sea transforms from a space meant to provide food and work into one fraught with danger and restrictions. In Gaza, a fisherman needs nothing more than a boat, a net, and safe waters to support his family, but when the sea itself becomes a source of danger, the search for fish becomes a search for survival as per the Palestinian Information Center.

Continue reading
Gaza’s Vanishing Minarets: Israel Destroys More Than 1,000 Mosques Since 7 October 2023

CROSSFIREARABIA – By August 2026, scarcely a mosque in Gaza escaped the war. Ancient Mamluk sanctuaries, neighbourhood prayer halls and modern mosques were reduced to rubble, while worshippers, imams and religious scholars killed. The scale raises a question that goes beyond battlefield damage: Were all these buildings legitimate military objectives, or has part of Gaza’s religious and cultural landscape been destroyed?

In Gaza today, the absence of the minaret has become almost as noticeable as the presence of the rubble.

For generations the skyline of Gaza City, Jabalia, Deir al-Balah, Khan Younis and Rafah was punctuated by domes and slender minarets. Mosques were not merely buildings entered five times a day for prayer. They were landmarks by which neighbourhoods identified themselves, places where families met, children studied the Quran, charitable committees distributed assistance and generations marked births, marriages and deaths.

After nearly three years of Israeli military attacks, much of that religious landscape has disappeared.

The latest figures supplied by Gaza’s Ministry of Awqaf and Religious Affairs and reported by the Palestine Information Center on 25 August 2026 state that 1,244 mosques out of the Gaza Strip’s 1,275 have been targeted since 7 October 2023. Of these, 1,077 have been completely destroyed. 

That means roughly 98 percent of Gaza’s mosques have been struck or otherwise affected, according to the ministry, and about 84 percent of the entire pre-war stock of mosques has been completely destroyed.

The ministry says only a fraction of Gaza’s pre-war religious infrastructure is presently functioning normally. In August 2026 it reported 224 standing mosques and 428 temporary prayer spaces, many assembled from timber, canvas and whatever material could be salvaged from the ruins. Sixty-five damaged mosques had been provisionally made usable.

The figures have risen dramatically as the war has continued. In October 2024 the ministry reported 814 mosques completely destroyed and another 148 damaged. By February 2025 it said 834 were completely destroyed and 275 severely damaged. By August 2026 the complete-destruction count had risen to more than 1,070.

International organisations use more conservative figures because they count only sites they have individually verified. OHCHR reported that, according to the Gaza Ministry of Endowments, 995 mosques and three churches had been partly or completely destroyed by 31 May 2025. UNESCO, using satellite imagery and site assessments rather than accepting the entire ministry inventory, had independently verified damage to 164 cultural sites by March 2026, including important religious monuments.

The difference therefore does not necessarily mean one side is counting inaccurately. They are measuring different things: Gaza’s ministry is attempting a comprehensive administrative inventory, while UNESCO and other UN bodies generally record only individually verified cultural properties.

The assault began almost immediately

Some of the first mosques disappeared within 48 hours of the 7 October attacks.

At approximately 4:30 a.m. on 9 October 2023, Israeli warplanes struck the Sheikh Ahmed Yassin Mosque in Gaza City’s crowded al-Shati refugee camp. Human-rights documentation subsequently reviewed by Airwars says the four-storey mosque was completely destroyed and three civilians were killed — two women and a girl. Around a dozen others were reported injured.

Nearby, the Al-Gharbi Mosque was also destroyed. Palestinian documentation says several missiles struck the mosque and three civilians in the area were killed. Because several mosques in al-Shati were attacked in the same period, casualty attribution varies between reports.

Then came the Abdullah bin Omar, or Al-Sousi Mosque, also in al-Shati.

An Airwars investigation records that an Israeli airstrike at approximately 11:10 a.m. on 9 October destroyed the mosque, killing 10 to 11 civilians and injuring around 60. At least two children and several women, including a pregnant woman, were among the dead according to the sources it examined.

A joint appeal submitted by Palestinian human-rights organisations Al-Haq, Al Mezan and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights to UN special procedures likewise recorded 11 civilians killed when Israeli aircraft struck Al-Sousi Mosque.

Other mosques reported struck during the opening weeks included Yarmouk Mosque, Abbas Mosque, Ishteiwi Mosque, Sheikh Shaaban Mosque, Shama’a Mosque, the Islamic University Mosque, Habib Muhammad Mosque in Khan Younis, Saad al-Ansari Mosque in Beit Lahia, Imam Ali Mosque in Jabalia, Al-Aqsa Martyrs Mosque in Nuseirat, Al-Omari Mosque in Jabalia, Anwar Aziz Mosque in Jabalia and Fatima al-Zahra Mosque in al-Zahra City.

These were not confined to Gaza City. From the first weeks the pattern stretched from Beit Lahia and Jabalia in the north, through Gaza City and the central camps, to Khan Younis and Rafah in the south.

Worshippers killed while gathered for prayer

One of the most disturbing characteristics of a number of attacks is their timing.

OHCHR has investigated the 15 November 2023 strike on Ihya al-Sunnah Mosque in the Sabra neighbourhood of Gaza City. The mosque was crowded with men and boys gathering for evening prayer.

The UN human-rights office says at least 63 Palestinians were killed.

More unusually, investigators were able to assess the probable weapon. OHCHR concluded that the strike was highly likely carried out with a precision-guided MK-83-class munition. The Israeli military did not publicly announce a target or justification for that particular attack, according to the UN investigation.

That distinction is important.

In most attacks on Gaza’s mosques it is possible to establish that an airstrike, artillery round, tank shell or demolition destroyed the structure. It is not possible to responsibly name the exact bomb model. Photographs of ruins alone rarely establish whether the weapon was an MK-82, MK-83, MK-84, GBU-series guided bomb or another munition.

Where there is forensic evidence, however, the picture becomes clearer.

The most notorious example came at Al-Tabaeen School and its mosque/prayer hall in Gaza City’s al-Daraj district on 10 August 2024.

Thousands of displaced Palestinians were sheltering in the compound. The strike came during Fajr, the dawn prayer.

Gaza Civil Defence ultimately reported more than 90 dead; early Palestinian government statements placed the figure around 100. Reuters reported the Civil Emergency Service’s estimate of about 100 deaths, while CNN reported at least 93.

CNN’s weapons analysis identified debris from at least one US-manufactured GBU-39 Small Diameter Bomb, a precision-guided weapon.

Israel acknowledged carrying out the attack. It said the prayer compound contained a Hamas and Islamic Jihad command-and-control facility and said militants were among those killed, while disputing the Palestinian casualty figure.

Palestinian officials and witnesses said the victims had assembled for dawn prayers.

Whatever the competing descriptions of those present, it remains one of the deadliest documented attacks on a place being used for Muslim worship during the war.

Deir al-Balah: Another mosque filled with displaced families

The Shuhada al-Aqsa Mosque beside Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in Deir al-Balah became another refuge for Palestinians who had already lost their homes.

Shortly after midnight on 6 October 2024, Israeli aircraft struck it.

Safa reported 21 people killed in the mosque alone, with dozens wounded. In the combined attacks on the mosque and nearby Ibn Rushd School, Palestinian officials initially reported 24 deaths and 93 injuries; subsequent international reports put the combined toll at least at 26.

Israel confirmed attacking the Shuhada al-Aqsa Mosque structure, saying Hamas personnel were operating from a command centre embedded there. The military said it used “precise munitions”, surveillance and intelligence intended to reduce civilian casualties. It did not publicly identify the specific bomb model.

This is an important example of the central dispute surrounding many mosque attacks.

Israel says mosques lose their protection from direct attack when Hamas or Palestinian Islamic Jihad uses them for military purposes. Palestinians argue that Israel has repeatedly invoked this explanation without publicly presenting evidence sufficient for independent scrutiny, particularly where displaced civilians were known to be sheltering in the same buildings.

Rafah’s Al-Farouq Mosque

Southern Gaza was no sanctuary either.

On 22 February 2024, an Israeli airstrike flattened the Al-Farouq Mosque in Rafah’s Shaboura area. Photographs showed little more than slabs of broken concrete where the mosque had stood.

Reuters reported at least seven bodies brought out following that night’s attacks on the mosque and neighbouring houses. WAFA likewise reported seven Palestinians killed in the Rafah bombardment, although available reporting does not establish that every one of the seven was actually inside the mosque.

The distinction matters: In a densely built city, a bomb dropped on a mosque may kill people in the mosque, in adjacent houses or in the street. Casualty totals should therefore not automatically be assigned to the mosque itself unless eyewitness or medical documentation establishes the location.

Great Omari Mosque: Destroying layers of history

Human loss is only one dimension of what happened.

At the heart of Gaza City’s old al-Daraj quarter stood the Great Omari Mosque, Gaza’s most important historic mosque and one of the oldest religious structures in Palestine.

Its architecture was itself a history book.

The site carried layers associated with antiquity, Byzantine Christianity, the Crusader period and Islamic Gaza. Parts of the structure incorporated a Crusader basilica. Mamluk and Ottoman rulers enlarged and embellished it. Its façade preserved a Gothic-style entrance arch, while its courtyard, marble mihrab, sandstone masonry and distinctive minaret spoke to later Islamic architectural traditions. UNESCO describes it as an architectural fusion and one of the principal monuments demonstrating Gaza’s continuous sacred history.

The complex covered approximately 4,100 square metres and was built largely of local kurkar sandstone. Historical inscriptions recorded Mamluk rulers, while the mosque’s library held old books and manuscripts.

It was struck more than once.

ICOMOS Palestine documented damage to its minaret in November 2023 and a devastating second Israeli airstrike around 7 December 2023, which destroyed most of the main structure.

Photographs afterwards showed the minaret rising almost alone from mountains of stone.

The precise bomb used in the December attack has not been independently established. It should therefore be described simply as an Israeli airstrike, rather than assigning it a particular bomb type without forensic evidence.

The loss is greater than that of one mosque. UNESCO’s description of Gaza’s historic centre stresses that the Omari represented the city’s successive Byzantine, Crusader, Mamluk and Ottoman layers — material evidence that Gaza was never an ahistorical refugee enclave but a Mediterranean city with centuries of urban continuity.

Ibn Uthman: A Mamluk masterpiece disappears

Another extraordinary loss occurred in Shuja’iyya.

The Ibn Uthman Mosque, built in stages between the late 14th and early 15th centuries, was one of Gaza’s finest surviving examples of Burji Mamluk architecture.

Its courtyard, porticoes, domed mihrab and decorative stonework made it, after the Great Omari Mosque, one of the most celebrated historic mosques in Gaza. Inscriptions preserved the names of Mamluk patrons and even a 15th-century decree concerning taxation in Gaza.

An Israeli airstrike destroyed the mosque during fighting in Shuja’iyya in July 2024. UNESCO has since independently listed Ibn Uthman among Gaza’s damaged cultural properties.

A structure surviving approximately six centuries had disappeared in seconds.

Sayed Hashem and Gaza’s sacred geography

The Sayed Hashem Mosque was another landmark damaged in the opening months of the offensive.

Situated in Gaza City’s old quarter, it is traditionally associated with Hashem ibn Abd Manaf, the great-grandfather of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), who according to local tradition died in Gaza while travelling through the region.

ICOMOS Palestine reported the mosque damaged by Israeli fire during the war and identified it among the city’s important historic religious losses.

Its importance to Gazans therefore extended beyond architecture. The shrine helped give Gaza one of its traditional names, Ghazat Hashem — “Gaza of Hashem.”

Destroying or severely damaging such a building consequently affects not only contemporary worship but a place-name, a historical narrative and a community’s relationship with its city.

A mosque dating from 1951 becomes the latest casualty

The destruction has continued well beyond the first two years of the war.

On 24 August 2026, Israeli aircraft destroyed Abu Salim Mosque in Deir al-Balah, according to Gaza’s Ministry of Awqaf and the Palestine Information Center.

Built in 1951 by Hajj Muhammad Abu Salim, it was among the early mosques of modern Deir al-Balah and had become a centre for Quran classes and community and religious activities. The attack also destroyed the prayer hall of Asqalan Mosque in al-Shati camp, while the Al-Radwan Mosque prayer hall in western Gaza City sustained damage.

The exact munition used against Abu Salim Mosque has not been publicly verified.

Its destruction is significant precisely because it was not an imperial monument or medieval masterpiece. Heritage is also accumulated living memory: Weddings, funerals, Ramadan nights, children’s lessons and the voices of successive imams.

The imams and preachers who died

The destruction also followed Gaza’s religious personnel.

Gaza’s Ministry of Awqaf said early in 2024 that more than 100 scholars, preachers, imams, muezzins and Quran teachers had already been killed.

By 2026 the number was considerably higher.

Figures published by the Palestine Information Center in August 2026 said that by the end of 2025, 233 Muslim imams, preachers and religious educators and 20 Christian clergy had been killed. Other ministry figures published in February 2026 spoke of more than 330 ministry employees, religious scholars and imams killed across the broader religious establishment.

Among prominent religious figures killed was Sheikh Yusuf Salama, a former Palestinian minister of religious affairs and former preacher at Al-Aqsa Mosque, killed when his home in Maghazi refugee camp was bombed. The preacher and imam Wael al-Zard died of wounds after an attack on his home, while Walid Oweidah, who headed a Quran memorisation department in the Ministry of Awqaf, was also killed in an attack on his home in Gaza City’s Sabra district.

These cases must be distinguished from people killed inside mosques. The available evidence shows many religious personnel were killed in homes or elsewhere, rather than during the actual destruction of their mosque.

What bombs were used?

There is no credible evidence that a single type of bomb explains the destruction of Gaza’s mosques.

The documented methods include air-delivered precision-guided bombs and missiles, artillery fire, tank fire, bulldozing and controlled demolitions using explosives placed directly inside structures.

In several cases the exact weapon can be identified. OHCHR assessed the November 2023 Ihya al-Sunnah Mosque attack as highly likely involving a precision-guided MK-83 munition. CNN identified the remains of a US-made GBU-39 Small Diameter Bomb at the Al-Tabaeen mosque/prayer-hall strike according to a United Nations report.

Amnesty International found another category of destruction entirely: Buildings blown up after Israeli troops had gained control of them.

Its investigation verified 43 videos depicting attacks on 34 mosques and documented at least 12 mosques destroyed in controlled demolitions. Amnesty specifically examined the Al-Dhilal Mosque in Bani Suheila and Al-Istiqlal Mosque in Khan Younis, concluding that manually placed explosives were used while Israeli forces controlled the locations.

That evidence matters because a controlled demolition is fundamentally different from a split-second airstrike during active combat. The question of immediate military necessity becomes harder to answer when troops already control a building and have the ability to search, secure or isolate it.

Did Israel have a military purpose?

Israel says unequivocally that it did.

The Israeli military has published a series of statements alleging Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad used mosques as weapons-storage facilities, meeting points, tunnel entrances and command centres. It says intelligence and material captured in Gaza demonstrated military use of “dozens of mosques.”

For individual attacks including Al-Tabaeen, Shuhada al-Aqsa and Al-Farouq, Israel has stated that militants or command structures were operating in or from the buildings.

International humanitarian law does not make a mosque immune under every conceivable circumstance. A place of worship being genuinely used for military action can lose its normal protection for the duration of that use. Even then, the attacking force remains bound by the principles of distinction, proportionality and precautions to protect civilians.

The harder question is whether a military explanation plausibly accounts for destruction on the scale documented in Gaza.

Here the evidence becomes much more troubling.

Amnesty International examined controlled demolitions in which Israeli troops appeared to be in physical control of religious and cultural properties and concluded in several cases that there was no evident imperative military necessity for destroying them. The organisation said the evidence suggested destruction itself may in some cases have been the objective.

OHCHR has reached similarly serious conclusions concerning the pattern rather than every individual strike. Its 2026 overview highlighted attacks during prayer times and reported that 17 mosques were struck during April 2024, including eight around Eid al-Fitr on 11 and 12 April. It said Israel had not presented evidence substantiating the loss of civilian protection for those places and concluded that the timing, weapons and pattern raised concerns that places of worship were either directly targeted or attacked without adequate precautions.

Those findings do not prove that every demolished mosque was intentionally attacked because it was a mosque. Nor do they establish that no mosque was ever militarily used.

They do, however, make it difficult to explain the destruction of virtually an entire religious landscape simply as incidental collateral damage.

More than buildings

International recognition of the cultural dimension has expanded as the ruins have accumulated.

A UN report noted the destruction or damage of the 800-year-old Sheikh Zakaria Mosque, the Great Omari Mosque and other important religious sites. UNESCO has independently confirmed damage to the Great Omari and Ibn Uthman mosques among the cultural properties it has monitored.

The Great Omari is now included within Gaza’s historic centre on Palestine’s UNESCO World Heritage Tentative List, which emphasises the survival in one urban landscape of Byzantine, Crusader, Mamluk and Ottoman architectural layers.

This is what statistics such as 1,077 completely destroyed mosques cannot convey.

A mosque is concrete and stone, but it is also sound: The dawn call to prayer; children’s voices reciting after school; a Friday congregation spilling onto the pavement; Ramadan evenings; neighbours meeting one another five times a day.

Destroy enough of them and something less visible is damaged — the system through which a community remembers itself.

That may explain why Gazans have begun erecting prayer spaces in tents and beneath sheets of plastic almost as quickly as the permanent structures disappear. By August 2026 Gaza’s Ministry of Awqaf said 428 temporary prayer spaces were operating across the Strip.

The minarets may have fallen, but the congregations have not disappeared.

And that leaves a question that any eventual investigation of the Gaza war will have to confront mosque by mosque, strike by strike:

What military necessity required each of these buildings to be destroyed — and where no such necessity can be demonstrated, was Gaza losing not merely a battlefield structure, but part of its religious history and collective memory?

The question becomes more urgent, not less, when the destroyed building is a 600-year-old Mamluk mosque, a packed prayer hall at dawn or a neighbourhood mosque built in 1951.

For Gaza, reconstruction will therefore involve more than replacing bricks.

It will mean reconstructing a landscape of worship, memory and history that, according to its own Ministry of Awqaf, has been almost entirely erased from the physical map of the Strip.

Continue reading
Israel Breaks The Ceasefire 12 Times

CROSSFIREARABIA – The Israeli occupation forces continue to break the ceasefire for the 307th day since it was signed in 10 October, 2025. Today, its genocide campaign continues while it refuses to move to stage II of the ceasefire and maintains its siege on the Gaza Strip and refuses to allow aid into the enclave and refuses the construction process. In the early hours of Wednesday morning, it broke the ceasefire 12 times through military strikes and tank fire on the different parts of the Gaza Strip despite its devastation. The attacks were focused on different parts of Khani Younis and Gaza City according to the Sanad News Agency.

Continue reading
In Art: Trapped Under The Rubble

Said Alatab writes:

My painting depicts a Palestinian mother and her children trapped beneath the rubble after bombing Gaza City. This work reflects the immense suffering, loss, and tragedy endured by innocent families caught in war. Through this painting, I hope to honor the victims and remind the world of the human cost of violence. Please share it. Please share and support my art

Alatab is a professional artist currently living in the United States having immigrated there in 1979. He was born in the Sabra and Shatila Camp in Beirut in 1959. After studying art in New York he became a professional artist with alluring paintings that display fascinating features which he says are inspired by his personal journey, struggles, and observations of the world.

“I often explore suffering, hope, and the human condition,” he points out. Currently, as his displayed works show, he is focusing on the war in Gaza and the suffering of its civilians. “For me, art is more than a career. It is my life’s purpose, a way to preserve memory and inspire reflection. I continue to paint to express truth, emotion, and hope.”

One of the artists who has influenced Alatab most is the great artist Vincent Van Gogh. “I feel a deep connection to his emotion, honesty, and intensity. His dedication to painting despite hardship inspires me to continue creating art that reflects my life, my struggles, and my vision of humanity,” he comments.

Continue reading